Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1802.09410

Infinitely many odd zeta values are irrational. By elementary means

Johannes Sprang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this small note, we provide an elementary proof of the fact that infinitely many odd zeta values are irrational. For the first time, this celebrated theorem been proven by Rivoal and Ball--Rivoal. The original proof uses highly non-elementary methods like the saddle-point method and Nesterenko's linear independence criterion. Recently, Zudilin has re-proven a slightly weaker form of his important result that at least one of the odd zeta values $ζ(5),ζ(7),ζ(9)$ and $ζ(11)$ is irrational, by elementary means. His new main ingredient are certain 'twists by half' of hypergeometric series. Generalizing this to 'higher twists' allows us to give a purely elementary proof of the result of Rivoal and Ball--Rivoal.

Explore related subjects

math.NT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Sprang. 2018-02-26. Infinitely many odd zeta values are irrational. By elementary means. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.09410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT↗
arXiv2026

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT↗