Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1803.00633

Numerical Accuracy Comparison of Two Boundary Conditions Commonly used to Approximate Shear Stress Distributions in Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Cultured under Flow Perfusion

Olufemi E. Kadri·Cortes Williams III·Vassilios Sikavitsas·Roman S. Voronov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Flow-induced shear stresses have been found to be a stimulatory factor in pre-osteoblastic cells seeded in 3D porous scaffolds and cultured under continuous flow perfusion. However, due to the complex internal structure of the scaffolds, whole scaffold calculations of the local shear forces are computationally-intensive. Instead, representative volume elements (RVEs), which are obtained by extracting smaller portions of the scaffold, are commonly used in literature without a numerical accuracy standard. Hence, the goal of this study is to examine how closely the whole scaffold simulations are approximated by the two types of boundary conditions used to enable the RVEs: "wall boundary condition" (WBC) and "periodic boundary condition" (PBC). To that end, Lattice-Boltzmann Method fluid dynamics simulations were used to model the surface shear stresses in 3D scaffold reconstructions, obtained from high resolution microcomputed tomography images. It was found that despite the RVEs being sufficiently larger than 6 times the scaffold pore size (which is the only accuracy guideline found in literature), the stresses were still significantly under-predicted by both types of boundary conditions: between 20 and 80% average error, depending on the scaffold's porosity. Moreover, it was found that the error grew with higher porosity. This is likely due to the small pores dominating the flow field, and thereby negating the effects of the unrealistic boundary conditions, when the scaffold porosity is small. Finally, it was found that the PBC was always more accurate and computationally efficient than the WBC. Therefore, it is the recommended type of RVE. Overall, this work provides a previously-unavailable guidance to researchers regarding the best choice of boundary conditions for RVE simulations.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.QMq-bio.TO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olufemi E. Kadri, Cortes Williams III, Vassilios Sikavitsas, Roman S. Voronov. 2018-03-01. Numerical Accuracy Comparison of Two Boundary Conditions Commonly used to Approximate Shear Stress Distributions in Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Cultured under Flow Perfusion. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3132

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

BreCol: Benchmarking Classical and Deep-Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Cancer Detection

DNA sequencing of the gut microbial community shows promise for cancer detection, but questions remain about the generalizability of results across studies. We propose BreCol, a benchmark of 2,040 16S rRNA gene sequencing runs across 26 studies spanning breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and healthy cohorts. Train-test splits are made within pre-2023 studies, while holdout evaluation uses studies from 2023 onward, reflecting temporal separation from training data. Classical models reach test/holdout AUCs of 0.77/0.60 for cancer diagnosis and 1.00/0.83 for cancer type prediction. We train the models on both cancer types simultaneously and find that colorectal cancer is often easier to detect than breast cancer. We also evaluate two deep learning models: HyenaDNA, a long-range sequence model that pools hidden states for classification, and SetBERT, a transformer that produces contextualized embeddings over sets of reads. Both deep learning models underperform the best classical methods on holdout data, though tuning training set size and the classification head yields modest gains. Our classical pipeline uses unsupervised clustering to derive features from tetramer frequencies, preserving within-run compositional signal and achieving near state-of-the-art performance without relying on taxonomic assignments. BreCol data and associated code are publicly available.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

Topological Inference for Organoids

The reproducibility of organ morphology and the extent to which computational models can predict morphogenesis remain difficult to quantify, particularly for organs with complex networks of fluid-filled lumina. Here, we combine Topological Data Analysis (TDA), biophysical simulation, and Bayesian inference to study lumen morphogenesis in pancreatic organoids. Lumen formation is governed by physical processes that are challenging to measure directly, including cell proliferation and luminal osmotic pressure. We simulate organoid development using a phase-field model and address the inverse problem of inferring these parameters from either time-lapse images or single morphological snapshots. Since lumen architectures vary substantially in size, structure, and connectivity, conventional geometric descriptors provide only a partial representation of their morphology. We therefore represent each organoid using SampEuler, a topological descriptor derived from the Euler Characteristic Transform (ECT). We first show that SampEuler captures morphological information encoded by established morphometrics. We then perform parameter inference using an approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) rejection framework with the SampEuler Wasserstein distance. Using synthetic organoids with known ground-truth parameters, our approach accurately recovers the osmotic pressure and the proliferation rate while revealing a compensatory trade-off between the two processes. Applied to experimental data from ten pancreatic organoids, the inferred posterior distributions are consistent with biological expectations. Together, these results establish a non-destructive, image-based pipeline for estimating otherwise inaccessible physical parameters governing lumen formation and highlight the potential of topological representations for linking complex biological morphology to mechanistic models.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

Circadian Derived Features for Early Discrimination Across Insomnia Severity Levels: At Least 8 Weeks of Monitoring Are Needed for Clinically Meaningful Assessment

Background: Wearable devices provide continuous, objective measures of daily activity and offer promise for assessing sleep disorders. However, the minimum monitoring duration needed to differentiate insomnia severity remains unclear. We investigated when wearable-derived behavioral features become informative for distinguishing Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) categories and examined the contribution of Activity Count (AC) and circadian-derived features. Methods: We analyzed wearable data from 2,305 participants in the Advancing Understanding of Recovery after Trauma (AURORA) study. Separate binary classifiers were developed for four ISI categories across six follow-up periods using AC and circadian-derived feature sets. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall, and AUROC. Results: Classification improved with longer monitoring. Across ISI categories, approximately eight weeks was the earliest time point at which wearable-derived features consistently achieved informative discrimination, with modest improvements thereafter. Participants without clinically significant insomnia were easiest to identify, reaching an AUROC of 0.693. Circadian-derived features performed comparably to, and in several cases better than, AC features, suggesting that the temporal organization of daily activity provides information beyond overall activity volume. Conclusions: Approximately eight weeks of longitudinal wearable monitoring may represent a practical minimum for differentiating ISI-defined insomnia categories. Longer monitoring provided only incremental improvements. Circadian behavioral features show promise as digital biomarkers for objective insomnia assessment.

q-bio.QM↗