Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1803.02942

Presentations of Categories of Modules using the Cautis-Kamnitzer-Morrison Principle

Abstract

We use duality theorems to obtain presentations of some categories of modules. To derive these presentations we generalize a result of Cautis-Kamnitzer-Morrison [arXiv:1210.6437v4]: Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a reductive Lie algebra, and $A$ an algebra, both over $\mathbb{C}$. Consider a $(\mathfrak{g} , A)$-bimodule $P$ in which (a) $P$ has a multiplicity free decomposition into irreducible $(\mathfrak{g} , A)$-bimodules. (b) $P$ is "saturated" i.e. for any irreducible $\mathfrak{g}$-module $V$, if every weight of $V$ is a weight of $P$, then $V$ is a submodule of $P$. We show that statements (a) and (b) are necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of an isomorphism of categories between the full subcategory of $\mathcal{R}ep A$ whose objects are $\mathfrak{g}$-weight spaces of $P$, and a quotient of the category version of Lusztig's idempotented form, $\dot{\mathcal{U}} \mathfrak{g}$, formed by setting to zero all morphisms factoring through a collection of objects in $\dot{\mathcal{U}} \mathfrak{g}$ depending on $P$. This is essentially a categorical version of the identification of generalized Schur algebras with quotients of Lusztig's idempotented forms given by Doty in [arXiv:math/0305208]. Applied to Schur-Weyl Duality we obtain a diagrammatic presentation of the full subcategory of $\mathcal{R}ep S_d$ whose objects are direct sums of permutation modules, as well as an explicit description of the $\otimes$-product of morphisms between permutation modules. Applied to Brauer-Schur-Weyl Duality we obtain diagrammatic presentations of subcategories of $\mathcal{R}ep \mathcal{B}_{d}^{(- 2n)}$ and $\mathcal{R}ep \mathcal{B}_{r,s}^{(n)}$ whose Karoubi completion is the whole of $\mathcal{R}ep \mathcal{B}_{d}^{(- 2n)}$ and $\mathcal{R}ep \mathcal{B}_{r,s}^{(n)}$ respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Giulian Wiggins. 2018-03-23. Presentations of Categories of Modules using the Cautis-Kamnitzer-Morrison Principle. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.02942

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A local relative trace formula for F*\SL(2,F)

In this note, we derive explicitly the local relative trace formula for the symmetric space F*\SL(2,F) at the level of Lie algebras, where F is a p-adic field of residue characteristic greater than two and F* is the set of invertible elements in F. This is perhaps one of the simplest non-trivial analogs of the trace formula, and also a motivating example for the author's work (in preparation) on the relative trace formula.

math.RT

Semi-infinite parabolic IC-sheaf

Let G be a connected reductive group, P its parabolic subgroup. We consider the parabolic semi-infinite category of sheaves on the affine Grassmanian of G and construct the parabolic version of the semi-infinite IC-sheaf of each orbit. We establish some of its properties and relate it to sheaves on the Drinfeld compactification of the moduli stack Bun_P of P-torsors on a curve. We also relate the parabolic semi-infinite IC-sheaf with the dual baby Verma object on the spectral side.

math.RT

The Grothendieck group of an extriangulated category

In this paper, we investigate the split Grothendieck group $K^{\rm sp}_{0}(\mathcal{M})$ of a $d$-rigid subcategory $\mathcal{M}$ in an extriangulated category $\mathscr{C}$. As applications, we prove the following results: (1) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a silting subcategory, then the Grothendieck group $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to $K_{0}^{\rm sp}(\mathcal{M})$; (2) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a $d$-cluster tilting subcategory, then $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to the index Grothendieck group $K_{0}^{\rm in}(\mathcal{M})$; (3) Let $\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d}$ be the $d$-cluster category of type $A_n$. If $d$ is even, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}/(n+1)\mathbb{Z}$. If $d$ is odd, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}$ if $n$ is odd; $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong 0$ if $n$ is even.

math.RT