Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1803.05970

Computing the Planar $\beta$-skeleton Depth

Abstract

For $\beta \geq 1$, the \emph{$\beta$-skeleton depth} ($\SkD_\beta$) of a query point $q\in \mathbb{R}^d$ with respect to a distribution function $F$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$ is defined as the probability that $q$ is contained within the \emph{$\beta$-skeleton influence region} of a random pair of points from $F$. The $\beta$-skeleton depth of $q\in \mathbb{R}^d$ can also be defined with respect to a given data set $S\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$. In this case, computing the $\beta$-skeleton depth is based on counting all of the $\beta$-skeleton influence regions, obtained from pairs of points in $S$, that contain $q$. The $\beta$-skeleton depth introduces a family of depth functions that contains \emph{spherical depth} and \emph{lens depth} for $\beta=1$ and $\beta=2$, respectively. The straightforward algorithm for computing the $\beta$-skeleton depth in dimension $d$ takes $O(dn^2)$. This complexity of computation is a significant advantage of using the $\beta$-skeleton depth in multivariate data analysis because unlike most other data depths, the time complexity of the $\beta$-skeleton depth grows linearly rather than exponentially in the dimension $d$. The main results of this paper include two algorithms. The first one is an optimal algorithm that takes $\Theta(n\log n)$ for computing the planar spherical depth, and the second algorithm with the time complexity of $O(n^{\frac{3}{2}+\epsilon})$ is for computing the planar $\beta$-skeleton depth, $\beta >1$. By reducing the problem of \textit{Element Uniqueness}, we prove that computing the $\beta$-skeleton depth requires $\Omega(n \log n)$ time. Some geometric properties of $\beta$-skeleton depth are also investigated in this paper. These properties indicate that \emph{simplicial depth} ($\SD$) is linearly bounded by $\beta$-skeleton depth. Some experimental bounds for different depth functions are also obtained in this paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rasoul Shahsavarifar, David Bremner. 2018-03-15. Computing the Planar $\beta$-skeleton Depth. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05970

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG