Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1804.00716

Aristotle, projectiles and guns

Abstract

When guns were developed in Europe in the 14th century, the theory of projectile motion was not the one we are familiar with today due to Galileo and Newton but the one taught by Aristotle approximately 1700 years earlier. In addition to Aristotle's wide-ranging philosophical concerns, his theory arose from the observation in everyday life that if an object is moving something must be moving it. This idea works very well for the horse and cart but is puzzling if you apply it to a thrown stone or spear. Problems with Aristotle's theory of projectile motion were identified by one or two people between his time and the 14th century, particularly John Philoponus (6th century AD) and John Buridan (14th century AD). An archer or a spearman does not need a theory of projectile motion, just a great deal of practice. But once the gun was invented it became important to know what angle a barrel should be oriented at and how much propellant to use, particularly as gunpowder was expensive. However, for many years afterwards the manufacturing techniques used meant that cannonballs were a loose fit to gun-barrels making cannons both inaccurate and of poor reproducibility shot-to-shot. Also air resistance makes the trajectory both impossible to calculate and qualitatively similar to theories based on Aristotle's writings. It was not until Galileo and Newton worked on the problem that a better theory of ideal projectile motion was arrived at.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephen M. Walley. 2018-04-02. Aristotle, projectiles and guns. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.00716

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Astrobiology and the Transformation of Scientific Epistemology

Astrobiology occupies an unusual position within the philosophy of science. Confronted with the n = 1 problem - having only a single example of life to study - it attempts to investigate life beyond Earth while relying entirely on Earth's biosphere as its reference point, a constraint that creates unique epistemic challenges. Unlike traditional sciences with clear predictive frameworks, astrobiology operates as what we might call a transient science: a discipline functioning without foundational certainties, relying predominantly on abductive reasoning, and confronting hypotheses that may remain untestable for decades. It is, in essence, a science of absence - of evidence, certainty, and analogy - where progress lies in refining conceptual and experimental tools to recognize unfamiliar forms of life. This positions astrobiology alongside emerging fields like artificial intelligence and cognitive science within a broader transformation of how scientific knowledge is constructed when dealing with phenomena that transcend direct empirical access.

physics.hist-ph

The wavelength of light as Thomas Young invented it

This paper documents Thomas Young's invention of a concept which he alternately refers to as the ''magnitude'', ''breadth'', ''interval'' or ''length of an undulation'' of light. First, the paper highlights that Young was first to link some concept of a wavelength to a theory of optics and to assign a precise value to this length for each component of the colour spectrum. Then, it sets out an explanation of how Young made up these values. Finally, it examines the reasons why Young introduced an optical wavelength into his theory of light, insofar as these reasons might in turn shed light on why he was first to do so.

physics.hist-ph

Pyroelectricity: A Brief History of its Discovery and Physical Principles - an Overview

This paper deals with the historical development and physical mechanisms of pyroelectricity, a phe-nomenon whose roots date back over 2000 years to ancient times. This paper is aimed at students and engineers as a concise introduction to the subject area. While the attractive effect of heated tourma-line was already described by Theophrastus, scientific systematization did not occur until the 18th century by researchers, such as Aepinus and Canton, who identified the effect of electrical polarization resulting from temperature changes. This essay highlights the path from early analogies to magnetism to the modern crystallographic description by Haüy and Thomson. In the physics section, pyroelectricity is defined as the temperature dependence of the spontaneous polarization in anisotropic solids. At the microscopic level, the permanent dipole moment of an elementary cell is described by the vector sum of individual moments. It is mathematically demonstrated that the macroscopic spontaneous polarization correlates with the surface charge density and is linked to the temperature change via the pyroelectric cofficient. A distinction was made between the primary pyroelectric effect and the secondary effect resulting from the thermal deformation of the crystal. Finally, the renaissance of this field of research through the development of modern infrared detectors and ferroelectric materials in the 20th century was highlighted.

physics.hist-ph