Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1805.11933

Tunneling Through the Math Barrier: The Fledgling Physics Student's Field Guide to Essential Mathematics

William J. Meese
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

[Taken from the "README" in the book] My goal with this book is to provide some kind of bridge for mathematics between the high-school-level and college-level for physics students. From my perspective, our job as physicists is to observe and understand the universe around us. Unfortunately our universe happens to be pretty complicated, at least from a mathematical point-of-view. However, a lot of the underlying physics | the underlying set of rules surrounding how things move and behave | is usually not too complicated. Sure, when we couple things together, everything turns disgusting, and we need to turn to really powerful computers or simulators to get a lot accomplished. But the basic rules are not that bad. My hope is to provide enough of a conceptual framework for you to learn to $read$ math as I saw a lot of other physicists do when I started my undergraduate career. I plan to cover some of the topics that tend to trip up a lot of physics students, although I could not cover these exhaustively. When I found that I should have covered more, but could not due to finite time constraints, I left a reference to other work that I think you may find helpful. However, unlike a lot of works, my focus is to help modify your thinking of how math is used, rather than just pummel you with algorithms for you to memorize without giving you the proper context for such algorithms. Whenever you find my explanations long-winded, feel free to proceed through faster. If you get stuck, you are always free to go back and see what I might have referenced before.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

William J. Meese. 2018-05-28. Tunneling Through the Math Barrier: The Fledgling Physics Student's Field Guide to Essential Mathematics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11933

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph↗
arXiv2026

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph↗
arXiv2026

A Workshop Series for Effective Use of AI in Uncertain Times: Building a Physics Faculty Learning Community

Generative AI tools are being widely taken up by students in their physics courses and beyond, often before instructors and institutions can develop policies and effective approaches for the use of these tools. Building on a framework for change in the era of AI, we developed and implemented a faculty learning community to help a university physics department address these challenges collectively. Over six biweekly sessions, faculty worked through course policies, classroom conversations about AI, AI-integrated coursework tasks, and assessment. Each session shared a common structure: we presented local data and department-sourced materials, tested them in small groups, and discussed them together, emphasizing durable pedagogical approaches over specific tools and platforms, and leading with evidence of students' own AI use. The series produced a shared, evolving repository of resources for faculty to draw on. This workshop provides an adaptable, theoretically informed model for a faculty learning community that departments can build on.

physics.ed-ph↗