Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1807.05513

Optimal Credit Investment and Risk Control for an Insurer with Regime-Switching

Abstract

This paper studies an optimal investment and risk control problem for an insurer with default contagion and regime-switching. The insurer in our model allocates his/her wealth across multi-name defaultable stocks and a riskless bond under regime-switching risk. Default events have an impact on the distress state of the surviving stocks in the portfolio. The aim of the insurer is to maximize the expected utility of the terminal wealth by selecting optimal investment and risk control strategies. We characterize the optimal trading strategy of defaultable stocks and risk control for the insurer. By developing a truncation technique, we analyze the existence and uniqueness of global (classical) solutions to the recursive HJB system. We prove the verification theorem based on the (classical) solutions of the recursive HJB system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lijun Bo, Huafu Liao, Yongjin Wang. 2018-07-15. Optimal Credit Investment and Risk Control for an Insurer with Regime-Switching. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.05513

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A note on markets with semi-static trading strategies

We consider a discrete-time financial market model where, in addition to finitely many dynamically traded assets, there are also (possibly infinitely many) static options to choose from. We introduce the concept of small cones of random variables and present a sufficient condition for the attainable positions in the market to be closed in probability. A fundamental theorem of asset pricing is shown in the present context. Utility maximization will also be considered. We will provide economically meaningful examples of infinite dimensional small cones to demonstrate the pertinence of our approach.

q-fin.MF↗

Affine Pricing Models from Group Quantization and Holonomy

The analytic tractability of affine pricing models is usually expressed through two complementary formulations: a coordinate-space pricing operator and an exponential-affine transform representation governed by generalized Riccati equations. We develop \emph{Affine Holonomy Group Quantization} (AHGQ) as a geometric framework in which these two formulations arise from the same underlying structure. The construction separates the affine pricing symbol into a homogeneous quadratic sector and a complementary affine sector. The first generates a finite-dimensional symplectic transport and a centrally extended Lie group, while the second is represented by a multiplicative holonomy carried by a thin-path groupoid. Their combination determines an affine Poincaré--Cartan form. Its characteristic dynamics reduce in momentum variables to the generalized Riccati system and its scalar amplitude, whereas the coordinate representation recovers the standard affine pricing operator. Representative Gaussian and square-root models illustrate the construction. The contribution is structural: AHGQ gives a common geometric origin to the coordinate and transform representations of continuous-path, time-homogeneous affine pricing models.

q-fin.MF↗

Asset price bubbles under model uncertainty and short-sale constraints: A discrete-time analysis

In this study, we investigate asset price bubbles in a discrete-time, discrete-state market under model uncertainty and short-sale constraints. Using a super-hedging valuation benchmark, we study the difference between the asset's market price and its fundamental value in this constrained market. We examine how assumptions on the liquidation time affect the conditional expectation bounds satisfied by the resulting bubble process. For assets with bounded maturity and no dividend payments, the G-supermartingale property of prices provides a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of bubbles. In contrast, when maturity is unbounded, the infi-supermartingale property yields a necessary condition, while the G-supermartingale property remains sufficient. We also show that no dominance rules out bubbles when the liquidation time is bounded. For finite-horizon contingent claims, we distinguish upper-valuation relations from no-dominance benchmarks. Fundamental prices satisfy put-call bounds, whereas market prices satisfy put-call parity under no dominance. In the dividend-free setting, the same assumptions imply equality between American and European call fundamental values and, under the stated trading conditions, between their market prices.

q-fin.MF↗