Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1808.02517

Fair Packing and Covering on a Relative Scale

Jelena Diakonikolas·Maryam Fazel·Lorenzo Orecchia
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Fair resource allocation is a fundamental optimization problem with applications in operations research, networking, and economic and game theory. Research in these areas has led to the general acceptance of a class of $\alpha$-fair utility functions parameterized by $\alpha \in [0, \infty]$. We consider $\alpha$-fair packing -- the problem of maximizing $\alpha$-fair utilities under positive linear constraints -- and provide a simple first-order method for solving it with relative-error guarantees. The method has a significantly lower convergence time than the state of the art, and to analyze it, we leverage the Approximate Duality Gap Technique, which provides an intuitive interpretation of the convergence argument. Finally, we introduce a natural counterpart of $\alpha$-fairness for minimization problems and motivate its usage in the context of fair task allocation. This generalization yields $\alpha$-fair covering problems, for which we provide the first near-linear-time solvers with relative-error guarantees.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.NImath.OC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jelena Diakonikolas, Maryam Fazel, Lorenzo Orecchia. 2018-08-07. Fair Packing and Covering on a Relative Scale. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.02517

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗