Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1808.03642

Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains

Sneha Vishwanath·Alexandre De Brevern·Narayanaswamy Srinivasan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The majority of the proteins encoded in the genomes of eukaryotes contain more than one domain. Reasons for high prevalence of multi-domain proteins in various organisms have been attributed to higher stability and functional and folding advantages over single-domain proteins. Despite these advantages, many proteins are composed of only one domain while their homologous domains are part of multi-domain proteins. In the study presented here, differences in the properties of protein domains in single-domain and multi-domain systems and their influence on functions are discussed. We studied 20 pairs of identical protein domains, which were crystallized in two forms (a) tethered to other proteins domains and (b) tethered to fewer protein domains than (a) or not tethered to any protein domain. Results suggest that tethering of domains in multi-domain proteins influences the structural, dynamic and energetic properties of the constituent protein domains. 50% of the protein domain pairs show significant structural deviations while 90% of the protein domain pairs show differences in dynamics and 12% of the residues show differences in the energetics. To gain further insights on the influence of tethering on the function of the domains, 4 pairs of homologous protein domains, where one of them is a full-length single-domain protein and the other protein domain is a part of a multi-domain protein, were studied. Analyses showed that identical and structurally equivalent functional residues show differential dynamics in homologous protein domains, though comparable dynamics between in-silico generated chimera protein and multi-domain proteins were observed. From these observations, the differences observed in the functions of homologous proteins could be attributed to the presence of tethered domain. Overall, we conclude that tethered domains in multi-domain proteins not only provide stability or folding advantages but also influence pathways resulting in differences in function or regulatory properties.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sneha Vishwanath, Alexandre De Brevern, Narayanaswamy Srinivasan. 2018-08-10. Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Multimodal AI predicts clinical outcomes of drug combinations from preclinical data

Predicting clinical outcomes from preclinical data is essential for selecting safe and effective drug combinations and for reducing late-stage failures. AI models use molecular structure and target annotations, and do not leverage the perturbation readouts that report how a compound acts in a cellular context. Here we introduce Madrigal, a multimodal AI model that learns from structural, pathway, cell-viability, and transcriptomic data. Madrigal aligns these modalities across 21,842 compounds into a shared latent space and predicts combination outcomes even for drugs observed in only a subset of the data modalities. Trained on 158 expert-curated and 795 patient-reported combination outcomes, Madrigal outperforms single-modality and state-of-the-art multimodal methods. Ablations show that modality alignment and multimodal input each improve predictive performance. Madrigal predicts elevated risk for combinations that share membrane transporters. In head-to-head trials that compare two combination arms,the arm with the higher observed incidence of neutropenia, anemia, alopecia, or hypoglycemia receives the higher predicted risk in 25 of 28 comparisons. In MASH, Madrigal ranks resmetirom among the candidates with favorable predicted safety when paired with type 2 diabetes drugs. Madrigal also improves adverse-event prediction in a longitudinal patient cohort and an independent oncology cohort and predicts efficacy in primary acute myeloid leukemia samples and patient-derived xenografts.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

ProteoEM: probabilistic protein abundance estimation from iterative affinity traces

Single-molecule affinity mapping enables molecular-level measurement of proteins and proteoforms, but imperfect and nonspecific probe binding makes individual affinity traces compatible with multiple molecular identities. Accurate abundance estimation therefore requires apportionment of ambiguous traces by weight rather than assignment to a single candidate. We developed ProteoEM, an expectation-maximization framework for weighted proteoform quantification, inspired by transcript abundance estimation methods for RNA sequencing and released as an open-source Python package. ProteoEM evaluates each molecule against every candidate using fixed, pre-calibrated probe-response rates held separate from the abundance estimate, while retaining the full likelihood of the observed affinity features. The framework estimates proteoform abundances, reports indistinguishable proteoforms as groups when measurements cannot separate them, and accounts for differential observation yields to distinguish the composition of observed molecules from that of the source sample. In simulations, ProteoEM accurately recovered the underlying molecular composition where approaches that reduce each trace to a hard yes/no call introduced substantial errors. ProteoEM's performance was insensitive to a moderate, uniform calibration error but was biased by informative missing data and by proteoforms absent from the reference. When observation yields were known, it also recovered source-sample composition from observed molecular counts. ProteoEM provides an open-source, reproducible framework for quantitative analysis of single-molecule affinity measurements, and these results motivate validation on experimental molecule-level data.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

PRAXIS-VirtualCell: A Programmable and Trustworthy Framework for Agentic Virtual Cell Experiments

Virtual cells are evolving from single-task predictive models toward programmable biological simulation systems, yet heterogeneous data, models, and validation evidence still lack a unified organizational framework. Here, we present PRAXIS-VirtualCell, a modular framework that organizes biological data, predictive models, perturbations, adapters, execution environments, and validation evidence to enable reproducible and auditable virtual experiments. The system supports cross-species tasks spanning Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and human K562 cells, while using biological contracts and evidence-aware execution to distinguish supported predictions from extrapolation and abstention. By further integrating agentic orchestration, PRAXIS-VirtualCell automatically translates natural-language questions into traceable virtual experiments, providing a unified runtime foundation for trustworthy and scalable Virtual Cell systems.

q-bio.QM↗