Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1809.02483

Hyperfields, truncated DVRs and valued fields

Abstract

For any two complete discrete valued fields $K_1$ and $K_2$ of mixed characteristic with perfect residue fields, we show that if the $n$-th valued hyperfields of $K_1$ and $K_2$ are isomorphic over $p$ for each $n\ge1$, then $K_1$ and $K_2$ are isomorphic. More generally, for $n_1,n_2\ge 1$, if $n_2$ is large enough, then any homomorphism, which is over $p$, from the $n_1$-th valued hyperfield of $K_1$ to the $n_2$-th valued hyperfield of $K_2$ can be lifted to a homomorphism from $K_1$ to $K_2$. We compute such $n_2$ effectively, which depends only on the ramification indices of $K_1$ and $K_2$. Moreover, if $K_1$ is tamely ramified, then any homomorphism over $p$ between the first valued hyperfields is induced from a unique homomorphism of valued fields. Using this lifting result, we deduce a relative completeness theorem of AKE-style in terms of valued hyperfields. We also study some relationships between valued hyperfields, truncated discrete valuation rings, and complete discrete valued fields of mixed characteristic. For a prime number $p$ and a positive integer $e$ and for large enough $n$, we show that a certain category of valued hyperfields is equivalent to the category of truncated discrete valuation rings of length $n$ and the ramification indices $e$ having perfect residue fields of characteristic $p$. Furthermore, in the tamely ramified case, we show that a subcategory of this category of valued hyperfields is equivalent to the category of complete discrete valued rings of mixed characteristic $(0,p)$ having perfect residue fields.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junguk Lee. 2018-09-07. Hyperfields, truncated DVRs and valued fields. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02483

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On triviality of $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action

T. Kambayashi had shown that $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over separable field extensions are necessarily polynomial rings. However, there exist inseparable $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms which are not necessarily polynomial rings. In this paper, we give a structure theorem for $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over arbitrary field extensions admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action. From this structure theorem we derive some conditions under which an $\mathbb{A}^2$-form becomes trivial. In particular, we prove that over a field $k$, a factorial $\mathbb{A}^2$-form having a $k$-rational point and a non-trivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action is trivial and we also give examples demonstrating that none of these hypotheses can be discarded. As a consequence of the structure theorem, we obtain a generalization of the Zariski Cancellation Theorem for the affine plane over an arbitrary field.

math.AC

Symbolic powers of the ideal of$n$ general points in $P^{n-1}$

Problem L of Fröberg--Lundqvist--Oneto--Shapiro asks for the difference between the Hilbert series of ordinary and symbolic powers of the ideal of general points in projective space. We solve this completely for \(n\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\). Besides a closed formula for \[ \HS(S/I^m)-\HS(S/I^{(m)}), \] we determine all minimal monomial generators of \(I^{(m)}\), and describe the symbolic Rees algebra. We also show that containment \(I^{(m)}\subseteq I^r\) is detected solely by initial degrees. This gives the exact containment threshold, the Waldschmidt constant \(\walpha\), the resurgence \(\Res\), and the asymptotic resurgence \(\aRes\): \[ \walpha(I)=\frac{n}{n-1}, \qquad \Res(I)=\aRes(I)=\frac{2(n-1)}{n}. \] We also take the first step beyond \(n\) points: for \(n+1\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\) --- again a rigid, non-monomial configuration --- we identify the defining quadrics, resolve the case \(n=3\) completely (a complete intersection, with \(J^{(m)}=J^m\) for all \(m\) and resurgence \(1\)), and propose an exact Waldschmidt-constant formula \(\walpha=\frac{n+1}{n-1}\) for all \(n\), verified computationally in every case we could check.

math.AC