Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1811.09411

Your Rugby Mates Don't Need to Know your Colleagues: Triadic Closure with Edge Colors

Abstract

Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ the NP-hard Strong Triadic Closure (STC) problem asks for a labeling of the edges as \emph{weak} and \emph{strong} such that at most $k$ edges are weak and for each induced $P_3$ in $G$ at least one edge is weak. In this work, we study the following generalizations of STC with $c$ different strong edge colors. In Multi-STC an induced $P_3$ may receive two strong labels as long as they are different. In Edge-List Multi-STC and Vertex-List Multi-STC we may additionally restrict the set of permitted colors for each edge of $G$. We show that, under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), Edge-List Multi-STC and Vertex-List Multi-STC cannot be solved in time $2^{o(|V|^2)}$. We then proceed with a parameterized complexity analysis in which we extend previous fixed-parameter tractability results and kernelizations for STC [Golovach et al., Algorithmica '20, Grüttemeier and Komusiewicz, Algorithmica '20] to the three variants with multiple edge colors or outline the limits of such an extension.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Laurent Bulteau, Niels Grüttemeier, Christian Komusiewicz, Manuel Sorge. 2021-03-11. Your Rugby Mates Don't Need to Know your Colleagues: Triadic Closure with Edge Colors. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09411

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS