Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1812.09302

Growth, Industrial Externality, Prospect Dynamics, and Well-being on Markets

Abstract

Functions or 'functionings' enable to give a structure to any activity and their combinations constitute the capabilities which characterize economic assets such as work utility. The basic law of supply and demand naturally emerges from that structure while integrating this utility within frames of reference in which conditions of growth and associated inflation are identified in the exchange mechanisms. Growth sustainability is built step by step taking into account functional and organizational requirements which are followed through a project up to a product delivery with different levels of externalities. Entering the market through that structure leads to designing basic equations of its dynamics and to finding canonical solutions, or particular equilibria, after specifying the notion of maturity introduced in order to refine the basic model. This approach allows to tackle behavioral foundations of Prospect Theory through a generalization of its probability weighting function for rationality analyses which apply to Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic societies as well as to the poorest ones. The nature of reality and well-being appears then as closely related to the relative satisfaction reached on the market, as it can be conceived by an agent, according to business cycles; this reality being the result of the complementary systems that govern human mind as structured by rational psychologists. The final concepts of growth integrate and extend the maturity part of the behavioral model into virtuous or erroneous sustainability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emmanuel Chauvet. 2020-07-28. Growth, Industrial Externality, Prospect Dynamics, and Well-being on Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.09302

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN