Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1901.04377

Lower bounds for multilinear bounded order ABPs

Abstract

Proving super-polynomial size lower bounds for syntactic multilinear Algebraic Branching Programs(smABPs) computing an explicit polynomial is a challenging problem in Algebraic Complexity Theory. The order in which variables in $\{x_1,\ldots,x_n\}$ appear along source to sink paths in any smABP can be viewed as a permutation in $S_n$. In this article, we consider the following special classes of smABPs where the order of occurrence of variables along a source to sink path is restricted: Strict circular-interval ABPs: For every subprogram the index set of variables occurring in it is contained in some circular interval of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$. L-ordered ABPs: There is a set of L permutations of variables such that every source to sink path in the ABP reads variables in one of the L orders. We prove exponential lower bound for the size of a strict circular-interval ABP computing an explicit n-variate multilinear polynomial in VP. For the same polynomial, we show that any sum of L-ordered ABPs of small size will require exponential ($2^{n^{Ω(1)}}$) many summands, when $L \leq 2^{n^{1/2-ε}}, ε>0$. At the heart of above lower bound arguments is a new decomposition theorem for smABPs: We show that any polynomial computable by an smABP of size S can be written as a sum of O(S) many multilinear polynomials where each summand is a product of two polynomials in at most 2n/3 variables computable by smABPs. As a corollary, we obtain a low bottom fan-in version of the depth reduction by Tavenas [MFCS 2013] in the case of smABPs. In particular, we show that a polynomial having size S smABPs can be expressed as a sum of products of multilinear polynomials on $O(\sqrt{n})$ variables, where the total number of summands is bounded by $2^{O(\sqrt{n}\log n \log S)}$. Additionally, we show that L-ordered ABPs can be transformed into L-pass smABPs with a polynomial blowup in size.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C. Ramya, B. V. Raghavendra Rao. 2019-01-14. Lower bounds for multilinear bounded order ABPs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04377

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC