Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1901.06579

Independent set and matching permutations

Abstract

Let $G$ be a graph $G$ whose largest independent set has size $m$. A permutation $π$ of $\{1, \ldots, m\}$ is an {\em independent set permutation} of $G$ if $$ a_{π(1)}(G) \leq a_{π(2)}(G) \leq \cdots \leq a_{π(m)}(G) $$ where $a_k(G)$ is the number of independent sets of size $k$ in $G$. In 1987 Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdős proved that every permutation of $\{1, \ldots, m\}$ is an independent set permutation of some graph with $α(G)=m$, i.e. with largest independent set having size $m$. They raised the question of determining, for each $m$, the smallest number $f(m)$ such that every permutation of $\{1, \ldots, m\}$ is an independent set permutation of some graph with $α(G)=m$ and with at most $f(m)$ vertices, and they gave an upper bound on $f(m)$ of roughly $m^{2m}$. Here we settle the question, determining $f(m)=m^m$, and make progress on a related question, that of determining the smallest order such that every permutation of $\{1, \ldots, m\}$ is the {\em unique} independent set permutation of some graph of at most that order. More generally we consider an extension of independent set permutations to weak orders, and extend Alavi et al.'s main result to show that every weak order on $\{1, \ldots, m\}$ can be realized by the independent set sequence of some graph with $α(G)=m$ and with at most $m^{m+2}$ vertices. Alavi et al. also considered {\em matching permutations}, defined analogously to independent set permutations. They observed that not every permutation of $\{1,\ldots,m\}$ is a matching permutation of some graph with largest matching having size $m$, putting an upper bound of $2^{m-1}$ on the number of matching permutations of $\{1,\ldots,m\}$. Confirming their speculation that this upper bound is not tight, we improve it to $O(2^m/\sqrt{m})$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Taylor Ball, David Galvin, Catherine Hyry, Kyle Weingartner. 2021-07-13. Independent set and matching permutations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06579

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO