Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1901.10551

A Critical Review on the Assumptions of SETI

Abstract

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) makes certain assumptions which guide all current search programs. To illustrate some, this includes (1) that interstellar flight is not possible (2) that the motivations of interstellar cultures are based largely on anthropomorphic understandings of homo sapiens (3) that the Fermi Paradox and the Drake equation are the starting point (axioms) of all reasoning (4) that definitions of 'life' are based largely on our understanding of homeostasis (5) that radio waves are the most likely method of interstellar communications (6) that unknown single event source signatures detected in space are not amenable to scrutiny due to the demands of the scientific method to be reproducible (7) that such anomalous signatures are either astronomical or communications based in type with no consideration for emissions from advanced industrialisation or propulsion and power technology. These assumptions, and others, have guided the SETI community towards a constrained level of thinking that is equivalent to philosophical dogma. In this paper, we unpack these assumptions, and others, and argue that the potential for life and intelligent life in the Cosmos may be much greater than the SETI community currently appears to conclude. It is also argued that more progress in our underanding of our place in the Cosmos can be made, if the separate disciplines of astronomy, interstellar spacecraft design, SETI, biology and philosophy can work together in a complementary way. Presented at the 47th IAA Symposium on the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. SETI and Society.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kelvin F Long. 2019-01-11. A Critical Review on the Assumptions of SETI. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Revisiting Aristarchus's method to estimate the ratio of the distances from Earth to the Sun and the Moon

In this article we revisit Aristarchus' ancient experiment to determine the ratios between the Earth-Moon and Earth-Sun distances. We present here the construction of a simple instrument, basically a tube that, by projecting its shadow, that allows one to estimate the Sun-Earth-Moon angle at the moment of first (or last) quarter. The simplicity of its construction and the accuracy of the measurements obtained may come as a surprise. We discuss the complexities involved in determining the exact moment of first quarter, based on the shape of the elliptical shadow projected on the Moon. Finally, we analyze and implement a strategy that allows us to approximate the measurement of this angle and estimate its value using observations that can be performed twice a month, and more accurately a couple of times during the year. We place Aristarchus' problem in its historical context and detail the physical and mathematical topics that can be developed and motivated through this experiment, in addition to carrying out a very thorough analysis of the errors associated with this measurement.

physics.pop-ph↗

Mass in the Light of Special Relativity

The text analyzes the concept of mass within Special Relativity, initially deconstructing the interpretation of Einstein's equation ($\varepsilon_\circ = m c^2$) as a principle of equivalence. Based on the adoption of the conservation laws of momentum and energy, the non-additivity of mass in composite systems is established. While in atomic and nuclear systems the total mass is less than the sum of its constituents, in the subnuclear domain the opposite occurs: the positive potential energy of confinement of quarks causes the mass of a hadron to be greater than the sum of the masses of its quarks; in the case of nucleons, it is much greater. It is concluded, then, that the mass of baryonic matter in the observable Universe comes, for the most part, from the energy associated with strong interactions.

physics.pop-ph↗

Understanding Quaternions and the Dirac Belt Trick

The Dirac belt trick is often employed in physics classrooms to show that a $2π$ rotation is not topologically equivalent to the absence of rotation whereas a $4π$ rotation is, mirroring a key property of quaternions and their isomorphic cousins, spinors. The belt trick can leave the student wondering if a real understanding of quaternions and spinors has been achieved, or if the trick is just an amusing analogy. The goal of this paper is to demystify the belt trick and to show that it implies an underlying \emph{four-dimensional} parameter space for rotations that is simply connected. An investigation into the geometry of this four-dimensional space leads directly to the system of quaternions, and to an interpretation of three-dimensional vectors as the generators of rotations in this larger four-dimensional world. The paper also shows why quaternions are the natural extension of complex numbers to four dimensions. The level of the paper is suitable for undergraduate students of physics.

physics.pop-ph↗