On Polynomial-Time Combinatorial Algorithms for Maximum $L$-Bounded Flow

Kateřina Altmanová; Petr Kolman; Jan Voborník

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1902.07568

On Polynomial-Time Combinatorial Algorithms for Maximum $L$-Bounded Flow

Kateřina Altmanová·Petr Kolman·Jan Voborník

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ with two distinguished vertices $s,t\in V$ and an integer $L$, an {\em $L$-bounded flow} is a flow between $s$ and $t$ that can be decomposed into paths of length at most $L$. In the {\em maximum $L$-bounded flow problem} the task is to find a maximum $L$-bounded flow between a given pair of vertices in the input graph. The problem can be solved in polynomial time using linear programming. However, as far as we know, no polynomial-time combinatorial algorithm for the $L$-bounded flow is known. The only attempt, that we are aware of, to describe a combinatorial algorithm for the maximum $L$-bounded flow problem was done by Koubek and \v{R}\'i ha in 1981. Unfortunately, their paper contains substantional flaws and the algorithm does not work; in the first part of this paper, we describe these problems. In the second part of this paper we describe a combinatorial algorithm based on the exponential length method that finds a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation of the maximum $L$-bounded flow in time $O(\epsilon^{-2}m^2 L\log L)$ where $m$ is the number of edges in the graph. Moreover, we show that this approach works even for the NP-hard generalization of the maximum $L$-bounded flow problem in which each edge has a length.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Kateřina Altmanová, Petr Kolman, Jan Voborník. 2019-02-20. On Polynomial-Time Combinatorial Algorithms for Maximum $L$-Bounded Flow. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07568

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗