Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1902.07615

Fluid-Structure Interaction for the Classroom: Speed, Accuracy, Convergence, and Jellyfish!

Abstract

When is good, good enough? This question lingers in approximation theory and numerical methods as a competition between accuracy and practicality. Numerical Analysis is traditionally where the rubber meets the road: students begin to use numerical algorithms to compute approximate solutions to non-trivial problems. However, it is difficult for students to understand that more accuracy is not always the goal, but rather enough accuracy for practical use and meaningful interpretation. This compromise between accuracy and computational time/resources can be explored through the use of convergence plots. We offer a variety of classroom activities that allow students to discover the usefulness of convergence plots, including a contemporary example involving jellyfish locomotion using fluid-structure interaction modeling. These examples will additionally illustrate subtleties of convergence analysis: the same numerical scheme can exhibit different convergence rates, and the definition of `error' may change the convergence properties. To solve the fluid-structure interaction system, the open source software IB2d is used. All numerical codes, scripts, and movies are provided for streamlined integration into a classroom setting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nicholas A. Battista, Matthew S. Mizuhara. 2019-02-20. Fluid-Structure Interaction for the Classroom: Speed, Accuracy, Convergence, and Jellyfish!. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07615

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO