Long-Bone Fracture Detection using Artificial Neural Networks based on Contour Features of X-ray Images

Alice Yi Yang; Ling Cheng

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1902.07897

Long-Bone Fracture Detection using Artificial Neural Networks based on Contour Features of X-ray Images

Alice Yi Yang·Ling Cheng

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The following paper proposes two contour-based fracture detection schemes. The development of the contour-based fracture is based on the line-based fracture detection schemes proposed in arXiv:1902.07458. Existing Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems commonly employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), although the cost to obtain a high accuracy is the amount of training data required. The purpose of the proposed schemes is to obtain a high classification accuracy with a reduced number of training data through the use of detected contours in X-ray images. There are two contour-based fracture detection schemes. The first is the Standard Contour Histogram Feature-Based (CHFB) and the second is the improved CHFB scheme. The difference between the two schemes is the removal of the surrounding detected flesh contours from the leg region in the improved CHFB scheme. The flesh contours are automatically classified as non-fractures. The contours are further refined to give a precise representation of the image edge objects. A total of 19 features are extracted from each refined contour. 8 out of the 19 features are based on the number of occurrences for particular detected gradients in the contour. Moreover, the occurrence of the 0-degree gradient in the contours are employed for the separation of the knee, leg and foot region. The features are a summary representation of the contour, in which it is used as inputs into the Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Both Standard CHFB and improved CHFB schemes are evaluated with the same experimental set-ups. The average system accuracy for the Standard CHFB scheme is 80.7%, whilst the improved CHFB scheme has an average accuracy of 82.98%. Additionally, the hierarchical clustering technique is adopted to highlight the fractured region within the X-ray image, using extracted 0-degree gradients from fractured contours.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Alice Yi Yang, Ling Cheng. 2019-02-21. Long-Bone Fracture Detection using Artificial Neural Networks based on Contour Features of X-ray Images. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07897

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗