Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1903.02813

Fock space representation of the circle quantum group

Abstract

In [arXiv:1711.07391] we have defined quantum groups $\mathbf{U}_\upsilon(\mathfrak{sl}(\mathbb{R}))$ and $\mathbf{U}_\upsilon(\mathfrak{sl}(S^1))$, which can be interpreted as continuous generalizations of the quantum groups of the Kac-Moody Lie algebras of finite, respectively affine type $A$. In the present paper, we define the Fock space representation $\mathcal{F}_{\mathbb{R}}$ of the quantum group $\mathbf{U}_\upsilon(\mathfrak{sl}(\mathbb{R}))$ as the vector space generated by real pyramids (a continuous generalization of the notion of partition). In addition, by using a variant of the "folding procedure" of Hayashi-Misra-Miwa, we define an action of $\mathbf{U}_\upsilon(\mathfrak{sl}(S^1))$ on $\mathcal{F}_{\mathbb{R}}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francesco Sala, Olivier Schiffmann. 2020-04-21. Fock space representation of the circle quantum group. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn%2Frnz268

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Categorification of quasi-split iquantum groups

We introduce a new family of graded 2-categories generalizing the 2-quantum groups introduced by Khovanov, Lauda and Rouquier. We use them to categorify quasi-split iquantum groups in all symmetric types.

math.QA

The Ring of Differential Operators on a Nodal Curve is not a Bialgebroid

In a previous article, we showed that local projectivity is a sufficient condition for the existence of a bialgebroid structure on the ring of differential operators on an affine variety. In this note, we show using elementary methods that the ring of differential operators on a nodal curve is neither locally projective nor does it admit a bialgebroid structure.

math.QA

Coset representatives corresponding to Yetter-Drinfeld modules of modular group and continued fraction

We give complete conjugacy classes of modular group SL(2,Z). Particularly, the conjugacy classes of hyperbolic elements are decided by the proper equivalence classes of indefinite forms, and we give an example. Finally, we describe the coset representatives of centralizer of S, ST, T and hyperbolic elements of SL(2,Z) by regular continued fraction. In conclusion, most Nichols algebras over modular group are infinite-dimensional except Proposition 4.10.

math.QA