Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1904.10250

Best Portfolio Management Strategies For Synthetic and Real Assets

Jarosław Gruszka·Janusz Szwabiński
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Managing investment portfolios is an old and well know problem in multiple fields including financial mathematics and financial engineering as well as econometrics and econophysics. Multiple different concepts and theories were used so far to describe methods of handling with financial assets, including differential equations, stochastic calculus and advanced statistics. In this paper, using a set of tools from the probability theory, various strategies of building financial portfolios are analysed in different market conditions. A special attention is given to several realisations of a so called balanced portfolio, which is rooted in the natural "buy-low-sell-high" principle. Results show that there is no universal strategy, because they perform differently in different circumstances (e.g. for varying transaction costs). Moreover, the planned time of investment may also have a significant impact on the profitability of certain strategies. All methods have been tested with both simulated trajectories and real data from the Polish stock market.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jarosław Gruszka, Janusz Szwabiński. 2019-09-05. Best Portfolio Management Strategies For Synthetic and Real Assets. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122938

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Separated Signal Libraries: Packing, Saturation, and Joint Spectral Limits

We study libraries of cross-sectional signals: at each date, a forecast vector over $d$ assets intended to predict the next period's cross-sectional return. Demeaned and unit-normalized, a signal is a point on a sphere and its $T$-date history a point on a product of $T$ spheres. A pairwise correlation cap on histories is a minimum angular separation on that product, so growing a library under such a cap is a packing problem. If a large library is not too pairwise correlated and is equally weighted, does the equally weighted sum (EWS) tend to a known principal-component quantity as it grows? We answer this under explicit assumptions on how the library is filled. Separation alone guarantees nothing: it fixes no limiting distribution; a saturated library covers the sphere yet can carry a biased count; and near-maximum packing on a fixed domain forces uniform volume, which on the unrestricted sphere gives zero mean and no distinguished principal component (PC1). Alignment depends on the admission rule and candidate distribution. Under the uniform product-volume benchmark, screening on positive average information coefficient (IC) yields a nonzero, target-aligned mean but an isotropic second moment, whereas a positive IC margin $β$ makat every finite $T$, with athree-level spectrum whose leading eigenvalue tends to $β^2$ while residual levels decay as $1/T$; margins of order $T^{-1/2}$ keep a positive admission rate but a vanishing eigengA finite residual-spectrum criteS-PC1 alignment.Gilbert-Varshamov codes show separation permits both outcomes: exponentially large positive-IC libraries exist whose EWS is PC1, and others whose EWS is orthogonal to PC1. $\log J=o(T)$ suffices for uniform estimation among $J$ candidates from $T$ iid dates. Derived results are proved and checked numerically; no market data are used.

q-fin.PM↗