Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1906.07594

Boolean properties and Bell-like inequalities of numerical events

Abstract

Let S be a set of states of a physical system and p(s) be the probability of the occurrence of an event when the system is in state s. A function p from S to [0,1] is called a numerical event or alternatively an S-probability. If a set P:={p(s)|s in S} is ordered by the order of real functions such that certain plausible requirements are fulfilled, P becomes an orthomodular poset in which properties can be described by the addition and comparison of functions. P is then called an algebra of S-probabilities or algebra of numerical events. We first answer the question under which circumstances it is possible to consider sets of empirically found numerical events as members of an algebra of S-probabilities. Then we discuss the problem to decide whether a given small set Pn of S-probabilities can be embedded into a Boolean subalgebra of an algebra P of S-probabilities, in which case we will call Pn Boolean embeddable. If Pn is not Boolean embeddable, then the physical system at hand will most likely be non-classical. In the case of a concrete logic P, that is a quantum logic which can be represented by sets, we derive criteria for the subset Pn of P to be Boolean embeddable which can be checked by very simple procedures, for arbitrary S-probabilities we provide sets of Bell-like inequalities which characterize the Boolean embeddability of Pn. Finally we will show how these Bell-like inequalities fit into a general framework of Bell inequalities by providing a method for generating Bell inequalities for S-probabilities from elementary Bell valuations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

D. Dorninger, H. Länger, M. J. Mcaczyński. 2019-06-18. Boolean properties and Bell-like inequalities of numerical events. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4877(20)30016-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO