Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1906.08910

Zero Latency for Emergencies: A Machine Learning based Approach to Quantify Impact of Construction Projects on Emergency Response in Urban Settings

Zhengbo Zou·Semiha Ergan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Continuous construction and rehabilitation in urban settings have unavoidable impacts on arrival times of first responders to emergency locations. Current research efforts on emergency response assessments focus on case studies, where specific periods (e.g., super storm Sandy) of emergency response times are analyzed. Simulation based studies that aim to evaluate response times in relation to various constraints/fleet sizes also exist. However, they do not analyze how specific changes (e.g., new and ongoing construction projects) in urban settings impact emergency response times of first responders. This paper aims to fill the gap and proposes a novel approach to predict the expected emergency response time for a given location using the fabric of zones regarding construction activities. This approach relies on historical records of emergency response and construction permits issued by city agencies. The approach first defines the signature of a zone (by zip codes) for construction activities based on the distribution of historical construction work types permitted in that zone over time. Then, zones that share similar signatures are clustered to find if there exists a relationship between construction signatures and emergency response times. Next, supervised learning algorithms are deployed to predict the average emergency response times for each cluster. The approach was tested using New York City's construction permit and emergency response records, and can be easily replicated for other cities with similar public datasets. This study serves as the first step towards quantitatively understanding construction projects' impact on a quality of life (QoL) indicator (specifically emergency response times) in urban settings.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhengbo Zou, Semiha Ergan. 2019-06-21. Zero Latency for Emergencies: A Machine Learning based Approach to Quantify Impact of Construction Projects on Emergency Response in Urban Settings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08910

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Algorithmic Shortlisting in Participatory Budgeting

Participatory budgeting is a democratic innovation that allows citizens to propose and vote on public investment projects. To help organizers manage large volumes of submissions, we design and test privacy-preserving methods for algorithmic shortlisting. These algorithms predict which projects are likely to be funded using only project features and anonymous historical voting data. We demonstrate the limitations of a naive approach that uses a large language model to rank projects based on past success and propose a vote-based pipeline that enables state-of-the-art LLMs to perform on par with classical machine learning. Our findings indicate that user preferences in participatory budgeting are stable enough to allow algorithmic shortlisting to approximate an initial selection of projects effectively.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Human Resilience in the AI Era -- What Machines Can't Replace

AI is changing work and decision making faster than many institutions can adapt their operating practices. We argue that this adaptation gap makes human resilience a core capability for the AI era. We define resilience as the capacity to absorb disruption while preserving effective action and human agency around core purposes. The framework operates at three interacting levels. Psychological resilience keeps a person goal-directed under stress. Social resilience makes trusted support and correction available across a group. Organizational resilience turns detected problems into learning and recovery. We connect established resilience and technostress research with direct AI-in-the-loop experiments. General resilience is trainable, while AI-specific causal evidence is still emerging. Direct AI studies show that assistance can raise productivity and spread expertise. Other experiments show improved expressed empathy and more calibrated reliance. We translate these findings into a practical agenda for AI education, workplace design, governance, and evaluation. The central proposal is socio-technical: structural safeguards define the operating boundary, while resilient people and institutions provide adaptive capacity when conditions change.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Toward a Time-Aware Assessment Framework for the Carbon Cost of AI-Enabled Decarbonization

AI is increasingly used to support decarbonization decisions across the built environment, yet the development, training, and use of AI consume energy and induce CO2e emissions. However, existing assessments often report physical-system savings while omitting AI-side emissions. Moreover, they rarely account for the mismatch between when AI costs occur and when decarbonization benefits materialize, which may be substantial for infrastructure-scale projects. To address these issues, we present a time-aware assessment framework that models avoided emissions and AI-induced emissions as discrete-time streams over a finite time horizon. In demonstrating this process, we seek to show that time-aware assessment can support temporal decision-making, identify cases in which accounting for time value of carbon can change preferred rankings relative to time-invariant totals, and explore how decisions may vary with slightly different governance priorities. Using four representative interventions with intentionally different temporal profiles (multi-project low-carbon concrete design support, AI-assisted construction logistics, agentic HVAC control, and predictive maintenance), we demonstrate how discounting can change preferred rankings relative to time-invariant totals and supports ranking sensitivity analysis, discounted payback screening, and break-even discount-rate analysis. We also provide decision guidelines that support go/no-go screening, timing decisions, and minimum "bang-for-your-buck" thresholds. Ultimately, this work contributes a lightweight framework for deciding whether and when to deploy AI-enabled interventions for decarbonization under explicit time preference.

cs.CY↗