Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1907.02963

Ice Giant Systems: The Scientific Potential of Orbital Missions to Uranus and Neptune

Leigh N. Fletcher·Ravit Helled·Elias Roussos·Geraint Jones·Sébastien Charnoz·Nicolas André·David Andrews·Michele Bannister·Emma Bunce·Thibault Cavalié·Francesca Ferri·Jonathan Fortney·Davide Grassi·Léa Griton·Paul Hartogh·Ricardo Hueso·Yohai Kaspi·Laurent Lamy·Adam Masters·Henrik Melin·Julianne Moses·Olivier Mousis·Nadine Nettleman·Christina Plainaki·Jürgen Schmidt·Amy Simon·Gabriel Tobie·Paolo Tortora·Federico Tosi·Diego Turrini
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Uranus and Neptune, and their diverse satellite and ring systems, represent the least explored environments of our Solar System, and yet may provide the archetype for the most common outcome of planetary formation throughout our galaxy. Ice Giants will be the last remaining class of Solar System planet to have a dedicated orbital explorer, and international efforts are under way to realise such an ambitious mission in the coming decades. In 2019, the European Space Agency released a call for scientific themes for its strategic science planning process for the 2030s and 2040s, known as Voyage 2050. We used this opportunity to review our present-day knowledge of the Uranus and Neptune systems, producing a revised and updated set of scientific questions and motivations for their exploration. This review article describes how such a mission could explore their origins, ice-rich interiors, dynamic atmospheres, unique magnetospheres, and myriad icy satellites, to address questions at the heart of modern planetary science. These two worlds are superb examples of how planets with shared origins can exhibit remarkably different evolutionary paths: Neptune as the archetype for Ice Giants, whereas Uranus may be atypical. Exploring Uranus' natural satellites and Neptune's captured moon Triton could reveal how Ocean Worlds form and remain active, redefining the extent of the habitable zone in our Solar System. For these reasons and more, we advocate that an Ice Giant System explorer should become a strategic cornerstone mission within ESA's Voyage 2050 programme, in partnership with international collaborators, and targeting launch opportunities in the early 2030s.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Leigh N. Fletcher, Ravit Helled, Elias Roussos, Geraint Jones, Sébastien Charnoz, Nicolas André, David Andrews, Michele Bannister, Emma Bunce, Thibault Cavalié, Francesca Ferri, Jonathan Fortney, Davide Grassi, Léa Griton, Paul Hartogh, Ricardo Hueso, Yohai Kaspi, Laurent Lamy, Adam Masters, Henrik Melin, Julianne Moses, Olivier Mousis, Nadine Nettleman, Christina Plainaki, Jürgen Schmidt, Amy Simon, Gabriel Tobie, Paolo Tortora, Federico Tosi, Diego Turrini. 2020-06-11. Ice Giant Systems: The Scientific Potential of Orbital Missions to Uranus and Neptune. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2020.105030

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Detectability of resolved hydrogen lines from the accretion shock at gas giants and their CPDs

Fewer gas giants have been caught in their accretion phase than mature ones are known. Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) instruments will have a higher sensitivity and a smaller inner working angle than tools up to now, which should increase search yields. We examine what METIS, the first-generation ELT spectrograph with R=1e5, can reveal about accreting gas giants. We focus on the accessible hydrogen recombination lines, mainly Brackett alpha and Pfund-series lines. Our approach is general but we take PDS70b as a fiducial case. It is similar to WISPIT2b. To calculate high-resolution line profiles, we combine a semianalytical multi-D description of the flow onto an accreting planet and its circumplanetary disc (CPD) with local non-LTE shock-emission models. We assume the limiting scenario of no extinction, appropriate for gas giants in gaps, and negligible contribution from magnetospheric accretion. We use simulated detector sensitivities to compute needed observing times. Both the planet- and the CPD-surface shocks contribute to the line, which has a Gaussian core but wider, asymmetrical wings. The line is much narrower than the free-fall velocity, and in fact has a nearly constant FWHM=30--40 km/s at low densities. For our fiducial accretion rate onto PDS70b, the Br-a line peak excess is as strong as the photospheric continuum, modulated mostly by H2O features. At Br-a, already the continuum of PDS 70 b yields a per-bin S/N=12 in 4h. With ProDiMo, we estimate the CPD not to hinder the detection of the line emission. The peak excess should require only 10 min to reach S/N=3. For pure shock emission, the line shape is barely sensitive to the planetary or system parameters. A complex profile would indicate that magnetospheric accretion contributes significantly. The high spectral resolution of METIS will help reveal line shapes even of faint accretors with great fidelity.

astro-ph.EP↗
arXiv2026

Centaur Longevity Revisited: Lifetime Dispersion and the Bailey & Malhotra Classifications under Modern Orbital Solutions

Centaurs occupy dynamically unstable orbits between Jupiter and Neptune and are typically removed by giant-planet encounters within a few Myr. Bailey and Malhotra (hereafter BM09) classified the known Centaurs, from 2007 orbits, into a short-lived diffusing class (D), a resonance-hopping class (R), and a long-lived, quasi-stable class (Q); their sole Q object, 2005 TH173, was fit to a 17\,d arc. We revisit both halves of that analysis on modern Jet Propulsion Laboratory Small-Body Database (SBDB) orbits (retrieved 2026-07-26), integrating clone ensembles of each object with the REBOUND WHFast $N$-body integrator. We ask (i) whether tighter orbital precision narrows the dispersion in clone lifetimes, and (ii) whether the BM09 labels survive on updated elements. Among 65 genuine Centaurs with arc $\ge 30$\,d and no censored clones, $σ(\log_{10}\mathrm{lifetime})=0.54$\,dex (a factor of 3.5). Conditioned on present-day $a$, $e$, $i$, and $q$, this dispersion is insensitive to relative semimajor-axis uncertainty (slope $=-0.002$\,dex per decade in $σ_a/a$; 95\% confidence interval $-0.034$ to $+0.030$) --- a chaos floor. On the D/Q axis, 49/50 comparable objects retain their BM09 class; 2005 TH173 is the exception (Q$\to$D): 80/100 clones escape before 10\,Myr (median 2.99\,Myr), and a 40\,Myr integration of the same initial conditions returns 88\,D / 12\,R / 0\,Q. None of the 30 multi-opposition 2007 orbits changes class; two short-arc objects leave the Centaur zone.}

astro-ph.EP↗
arXiv2026

Feasibility of the Phobos 1 Hypothesis for Dark Comet 1998 KY$_{26}$

The asteroid 1998 KY$_{26}$ has been the subject of thorough observation, both optical and radar, from shortly following its discovery on 28 May 1998, through 2 further close apparitions in 2020 and 2024. This has previously allowed an accurate characterization of the object, including an unusually rapid spin-rate with period 5.3516 $\pm$ 0.0001 minutes, a diameter of 11 $\pm$ 2 m, and a high albedo of $\sim{0.52}$. Furthermore, the presence of significant nongravitational accelerations (NGAs), with no detectable shedding of gas or dust, has stimulated the 'dark comet' categorization, with JAXA repurposing their Hayabusa2$\sharp$ spacecraft to rendezvous with the object in 2031. We follow-up the astrodynamical evidence pointing to the possibility this may actually be the lost Soviet Phobos 1 probe, and analyse various photometry and astrometry associated with 1998 KY$_{26}$ to further investigate the feasibility of this hypothesis. We find a first order approximation of the Phobos 1 spacecraft provides compelling agreement to 8 light curves of the object and further that modelling NGAs as solar radiation pressure (SRP) on a cylinder or solar panels provide significant reductions in residual of $\sim{11} \%$ with respect to the 260 astrometric and radar measurements. Although an investigation of this kind cannot be conclusive, nevertheless the results here add strong weight to the Phobos 1 hypothesis, and we find no clear contradictory evidence. The spin pole in Ecliptic J2000 coordinates, calculated from photometry based on the Phobos 1 assumption is $(λ,β)=({151^{+1}_{-2}}^{\circ},{+11^{+12}_{- 3}}^{\circ})$ , where the quoted ranges represent approximate 68.3\% confidence levels.

astro-ph.EP↗