Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1907.04521

The complexity of the first-order theory of pure equality

Ivan V. Latkin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We will find a lower bound on the recognition complexity of the theories that are nontrivial relative to some equivalence relation (this relation may be equality), namely, each of these theories is consistent with the formula, whose sense is that there exist two non-equivalent elements. However, at first, we will obtain a lower bound on the computational complexity for the first-order theory of Boolean algebra that has only two elements. For this purpose, we will code the long-continued deterministic Turing machine computations by the relatively short-length quantified Boolean formulae; the modified Stockmeyer and Meyer method will appreciably be used for this simulation. Then, we will transform the modeling formulae of the theory of this Boolean algebra to the simulation ones of the first-order theory of the only equivalence relation in polynomial time. Since the computational complexity of these theories is not polynomial, we obtain that the class $\mathbf{P}$ is a proper subclass of $\mathbf{PSPACE}$ (Polynomial Time is a proper subset of Polynomial Space). Keywords: Computational complexity, the theory of equality, the coding of computations, simulation by means formulae, polynomial time, polynomial space, lower complexity bound

Explore related subjects

math.LOcs.CCcs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ivan V. Latkin. 2021-07-04. The complexity of the first-order theory of pure equality. https://doi.org/10.32523/2077-9879-2022-13-1-44-68

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO↗