Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1907.05219

Una dimostrazione diretta della legge di probabilità di Poisson (A direct proof of the Poisson probability law)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to prove directly, by an elementary method, the Poisson probability law. This proof is offered as an alternative to the more usual derivation from binomial distribution in the limit of small probabilities. The same proof is then applied to the solution of a problem in statistical mechanics. --- Lo scopo di questo articolo è dimostrare direttamente, con un metodo elementare, la legge di probabilità di Poisson. Questa dimostrazione è proposta in alternativa alla più consueta derivazione dalla distribuzione binomiale nel limite delle piccole probabilità. La stessa dimostrazione viene quindi applicata alla soluzione di un problema di meccanica statistica.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pier Franco Nali. 2019-07-09. Una dimostrazione diretta della legge di probabilità di Poisson (A direct proof of the Poisson probability law). https://doi.org/10.1393/gdf%2Fi2022-10494-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO