Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1907.05537

Covers and direct limits: a contramodule-based approach

Abstract

We present applications of contramodule techniques to the Enochs conjecture about covers and direct limits, both in the categorical tilting context and beyond. In the $n$-tilting-cotilting correspondence situation, if $\mathsf A$ is a Grothendieck abelian category and the related abelian category $\mathsf B$ is equivalent to the category of contramodules over a topological ring $\mathfrak R$ belonging to one of certain four classes of topological rings (e.g., $\mathfrak R$ is commutative), then the left tilting class is covering in $\mathsf A$ if and only if it is closed under direct limits in $\mathsf A$, and if and only if all the discrete quotient rings of the topological ring $\mathfrak R$ are perfect. More generally, if $M$ is a module satisfying a certain telescope Hom exactness condition (e.g., $M$ is $Σ$-pure-$\operatorname{Ext}^1$-self-orthogonal) and the topological ring $\mathfrak R$ of endomorphisms of $M$ belongs to one of certain seven classes of topological rings, then the class $\mathsf{Add}(M)$ is closed under direct limits if and only if every countable direct limit of copies of $M$ has an $\mathsf{Add}(M)$-cover, and if and only if $M$ has perfect decomposition. In full generality, for an additive category $\mathsf A$ with (co)kernels and a precovering class $\mathsf L\subset\mathsf A$ closed under summands, an object $N\in\mathsf A$ has an $\mathsf L$-cover if and only if a certain object $Ψ(N)$ in an abelian category $\mathsf B$ with enough projectives has a projective cover. The $1$-tilting modules and objects arising from injective ring epimorphisms of projective dimension $1$ form a class of examples which we discuss.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Silvana Bazzoni, Leonid Positselski. 2021-01-08. Covers and direct limits: a contramodule-based approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-020-02654-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The category of nominal sets is locally monoidal closed

The category Nom of nominal sets was proposed by Pitts and Gabbay as a setting for the semantics of abstract syntax with variable bindings. It is well-known that Nom is a topos, also known as the Schanuel topos, and in particular it follows that Nom is locally closed, i.e., every slice category Nom/X is cartesian-closed. In this paper, we show that Nom has a much stronger property: every monoidal (closed) structure on Nom induces a monoidal (closed) structure on all slice categories Nom/X. One monoidal closed structure of particular interest on Nom is the separated product A * B, whose right adjoint A -* B is called the separated function space. In particular, it follows that Nom is locally separatedly closed.

math.CT

Hochschild cohomology of the second kind: Koszul duality and Morita invariance

We define Hochschild cohomology of the second kind for differential graded (dg) or curved algebras as a derived functor in the twisted derived category. The Hochschild cohomology of the second kind of a curved or curved algebra $A$ is then equivalent to the classical Hochschild cohomology of the twisted derived dg category of $A$, which is often geometrically meaningful. Examples include the category of $\infty$-local systems on a topological space, the bounded derived category of a complex manifold and the category of matrix factorizations. We also show that Hochschild cohomology of the second kind is preserved under (nonconilpotent) Koszul duality and weak equivalences of curved algebras. The main technical ingredient is a new bimodule version of Koszul duality.

math.CT

Localization of lax symmetric monoidal categories

In this note, we explain in some detail how one can fiberwise localize a (co)lax symmetric monoidal infinity-category. This construction was tacitly used in Section 5 of our recent paper "On the equivalence of the Lurie's infinity-operads and dendroidal infinity-operads". Version 2: A stronger version of the result is proven. Given a locally cocartesian fibration $f:X\to B$ and a collection of marked arrows $X^\circ\subset f^{-1}(B^{eq})$ in $X$ closed under locally cocartesian liftings, we prove that the localization $\mathcal{L}(X,X^\circ)\to B$ is also a locally cocartesian fibration whose fibers are localizations of the fibers of $f$. This result is applied to the description of localizations of lax symmetric monoidal categories.

math.CT