Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1907.07606

Privacy-Aware Location Sharing with Deep Reinforcement Learning

Abstract

Location-based services (LBSs) have become widely popular. Despite their utility, these services raise concerns for privacy since they require sharing location information with untrusted third parties. In this work, we study privacy-utility trade-off in location sharing mechanisms. Existing approaches are mainly focused on privacy of sharing a single location or myopic location trace privacy; neither of them taking into account the temporal correlations between the past and current locations. Although these methods preserve the privacy for the current time, they may leak significant amount of information at the trace level as the adversary can exploit temporal correlations in a trace. We propose an information theoretically optimal privacy preserving location release mechanism that takes temporal correlations into account. We measure the privacy leakage by the mutual information between the user's true and released location traces. To tackle the history-dependent mutual information minimization, we reformulate the problem as a Markov decision process (MDP), and solve it using asynchronous actor-critic deep reinforcement learning (RL).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ecenaz Erdemir, Pier Luigi Dragotti, Deniz Gunduz. 2019-10-03. Privacy-Aware Location Sharing with Deep Reinforcement Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07606

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

When Relaxation Does Not Help: RLDCs with Small Soundness Yield LDCs

Locally decodable codes (LDCs) are error-correcting codes that allow recovery of any single message symbol by probing only a small number of positions from the (possibly corrupted) codeword. Relaxed locally decodable codes (RLDCs) further allow the decoder to output a special failure symbol $\bot$ on a corrupted codeword. While known constructions of RLDCs achieve much better parameters than standard LDCs, it is intriguing to understand the relationship between LDCs and RLDCs. On the one hand, separation results (i.e., the existence of $q$-query RLDCs that are not $q$-query LDCs) are known for $q=3$ (Gur, Minzer, Weissenberg, and Zheng, STOC 2026) and $q \geq 15$ (Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon, STOC 2026). On the other hand, prior work (Block, Blocki, Cheng, Grigorescu, Li, Zheng, and Zhu, CCC 2023) shows that any $2$-query RLDC also gives a $2$-query LDC, and Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (STOC 2026) show that any \emph{linear} $3$-query RLDC is also a linear $3$-query LDC. Furthermore, Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (STOC 2026) show that when the soundness error of a \emph{linear} $q$-query RLDC with perfect completeness is below some threshold $s(q)$, the code must also be a linear $q$-query LDC with comparable parameters. In this work, we extend the main result of Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (STOC 2026) by removing the linearity requirement in the nonadaptive setting. Specifically, we show that every nonadaptive $(q,δ,1,s)$-RLDC over a finite alphabet $Σ$ with $s<|Σ|^{-q}$ yields a $q$-query LDC with comparable decoding radius and error. Our results also extend to the setting of locally correctable codes (LCCs) and relaxed locally correctable codes (RLCCs). From this, we also obtain lower bounds for nonadaptive RLDCs from known LDC lower bounds.

cs.IT

A Mathematical Theory of Pragmatic Information

We propose a pragmatic information theory unifying communication, control, and decision-making. Its core is the isoteleia mapping, formalizing equifinality: distinct semantic paths leading to the same optimal action are pragmatically equivalent. This induces a three-tier hierarchy of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic information, each abstraction discarding task-irrelevant distinctions. We develop pragmatic entropy, up/down mutual information, channel capacity, and rate-distortion, and prove three coding theorems generalizing Shannon's classical results. We introduce pragmatic value (VoI) and cost (CoI) of information as decision-theoretic duals to rate-distortion and capacity, respectively, and formulate a Lagrangian dual framework for cross-layer optimization. The pragmatic efficiency bound $\mathcal{E}_p(\lambda)=\sup_R[\Phi_p(R)-\lambda\,\mathrm{CoI}_p(R)]$ quantifies the maximum net utility any resource-constrained intelligent system can extract, thereby establishing a fundamental behavioral capacity limit---generalizing Shannon's symbol-level capacity to goal-directed action. Extensions to continuous messages yield closed-form Gaussian expressions, while dynamic settings are addressed via a Bellman equation for sequential decision-making. This framework provides a rigorous foundation for task-oriented communication, networked control, autonomous systems, and embodied AI, shifting focus from symbol fidelity to the effectiveness of information in guiding actions, and offers a unified mathematical language for next-generation intelligent systems.

cs.IT

Data Protection in Function-Correcting Symbol-Pair Codes: Redundancy Bounds and Protection Profiles

In several storage systems, including DNA storage and flash memory, errors affect neighbouring symbols jointly, and the Hamming metric does not adequately capture such error patterns. The symbol-pair read channel, introduced by Cassuto and Blaum~\cite{cassuto2011codes}, addresses this by reading consecutive pairs of symbols rather than individual symbols. Motivated by this, we introduce function-correcting symbol-pair codes with data protection (FCSPC-DP), which guarantee reliable recovery of a desired function of the message while simultaneously protecting the message itself against symbol-pair errors. We derive bounds on the optimal redundancy of such codes and establish a relationship with joint-pair distance matrices. We also give explicit constructions of FCSPC-DP for locally pair-bounded functions and symbol-pair weight functions. We introduce the pair-separation constant of a function, the minimum symbol-pair distance between messages sharing a function value, and show that when it is sufficiently large, data protection requires no additional redundancy: the optimal redundancy coincides with that of the corresponding code without data protection. Considering the symbol-pair analogue of the $α$-distance graph, we introduce two code invariants, the generation profile and the disconnection threshold, and use them to characterise a code's protection properties. Relating the two metrics through these invariants yields upper and lower bounds on the symbol-pair threshold in terms of its Hamming counterpart, both of which are attained. We further extend the classical Plotkin and sphere-packing bounds to this setting.

cs.IT