Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1908.01177

Chain Logic and Shelah's Infinitary Logic

Abstract

For a cardinal of the form $\kappa=\beth_\kappa$, Shelah's logic $L^1_\kappa$ has a characterisation as the maximal logic above $\bigcup_{\lambda<\kappa} L_{\lambda, \omega}$ satisfying Strong Undefinability of Well Order (SUDWO). SUDWO is a strengthening of the Undefinability of Well Order (UDWO). We prove that if $\kappa$ is singular of countable cofinality, Karp's chain logic \cite{Karpintroduceschain} is above $L^1_\kappa$, while it is already known that it satisfies UDWO and Interpolation. Moreover, we show that in these circumstances, the chain logic is -- in a sense -- maximal among logics with chain models to satisfy UDWO. We then show that the chain logic gives a partial solution to Problem 1.4. from Shelah's \cite{Sh797}, which asked whether for $\kappa$ singular of countable cofinality there was a logic strictly between $ L_{\kappa^+, \omega}$ and $L_{\kappa^+, \kappa^+}$ having Interpolation. We show that modulo accepting as the upper bound a model class of $L_{\kappa, \kappa}$, Karp's chain logic satisfies the required properties. In addition, we show that this chain logic is not $\kappa$-compact, a question that we have asked on various occasions. We contribue to the further development of chain logic by proving the Union Lemma and identifying the chain-independent fragment of the logic, showing that it still has considerable expressive power. In conclusion, we have shown that the simply defined chain logic emulates the logic $L^1_\kappa$ in satisfying Interpolation, undefinability of well-order and maximality with respect to it, and the Union Lemma. In addition it has a Completeness Theorem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mirna Džamonja, Jouko Väänänen. 2019-08-03. Chain Logic and Shelah's Infinitary Logic. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.01177

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO