Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1909.08648

New Policy Design for Food Accessibility to the People in Need

Abstract

Food insecurity is a term used to measure hunger and food deprivation of a large population. As per the 2015 statistics provided by Feeding America - one of the largest domestic hunger-relief organizations in the United States, 42.2 million Americans live in food insecure households, including 29.1 million adults and 13.1 million children. This constitutes about 13.1% of households that are food insecure. Food Banks have been developed to improve food security for the needy. We have developed a novel food distribution policy using suitable welfare and poverty indices and functions. In this work, we propose an equitable and fair distribution of donated foods as per the demands and requirements of the people, thus ensuring minimum wastage of food (perishable and non-perishable) with focus towards nutrition. We present results and analysis based on the application of the proposed policy using the information of a local food bank as a case study. The results show that the new policy performs better than the current methods in terms of population being covered and reduction of food wastage obtaining suitable levels of nutrition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rahul Srinivas Sucharitha, Seokcheon Lee. 2019-09-18. New Policy Design for Food Accessibility to the People in Need. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08648

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN