Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1910.13905

Interplay between Topology and Social Learning over Weak Graphs

Abstract

We consider a social learning problem, where a network of agents is interested in selecting one among a finite number of hypotheses. We focus on weakly-connected graphs where the network is partitioned into a sending part and a receiving part. The data collected by the agents might be heterogeneous. For example, some sub-networks might intentionally generate data from a fake hypothesis in order to influence other agents. The social learning task is accomplished via a diffusion strategy where each agent: i) updates individually its belief using its private data; ii) computes a new belief by exponentiating a linear combination of the log-beliefs of its neighbors. First, we examine what agents learn over weak graphs (social learning problem). We obtain analytical formulas for the beliefs at the different agents, which reveal how the agents' detection capability and the network topology interact to influence the beliefs. In particular, the formulas allow us to predict when a leader-follower behavior is possible, where some sending agents can control the mind of the receiving agents by forcing them to choose a particular hypothesis. Second, we consider the dual or reverse learning problem that reveals how agents learned: given a stream of beliefs collected at a receiving agent, we would like to discover the global influence that any sending component exerts on this receiving agent (topology learning problem). A remarkable and perhaps unexpected interplay between social and topology learning is observed: given $H$ hypotheses and $S$ sending components, topology learning can be feasible when $H\geq S$. The latter being only a necessary condition, we examine the feasibility of topology learning for two useful classes of problems. The analysis reveals that a critical element to enable faithful topology learning is the diversity in the statistical models of the sending sub-networks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vincenzo Matta, Virginia Bordignon, Augusto Santos, Ali H. Sayed. 2019-10-30. Interplay between Topology and Social Learning over Weak Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13905

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Highway Congestion Reduction through Reinforcement Learning Based Eulerian Headway Control

Connected automated vehicles (CAVs) equipped with adaptive cruise control (ACC) create new opportunities for highway congestion mitigation. Traditional practice relies on Eulerian variable speed limits (VSL) which regulate traffic through roadside signs, but suffer from infrequent updates and limited driver compliance. Recent research explored Lagrangian strategies that directly control individual vehicles, offering high reactivity and compliance, yet in realistic multi-lane settings they depend on drivers' latent lane-change intentions, making robust vehicle-level decisions difficult. Hence, we propose an Eulerian control system optimized through reinforcement learning, that (i) leverages ACC for reactivity and compliance, and (ii) obviates dependence on latent driver intentions by regulating aggregate density near bottlenecks, crucially via headway commands rather than speed commands. We evaluate two variants of our system, time-headway and distance-headway control, in large-scale simulations across a range of traffic conditions. Both variants outperform baselines, improving traffic flow by up to 10.6% over human traffic and 6.7% over traditional VSL. To strengthen evaluation, we propose a novel boundary-aware speed metric addressing a recognized flaw in simulation studies with dynamic vehicle entry and exit. The empirical results, together with our emphasis on deployable system design, suggest a path towards practical, safe, and scalable highway congestion mitigation.

cs.MA

The Bystander Effect in Multi-Agent Reasoning: Quantifying Cognitive Loafing in Collaborative Interactions

Multi-agent systems (MAS) assume that collaborating inherently improves Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning. We challenge this by demonstrating that simulated social pressure triggers an algorithmic ``Bystander Effect,'' inducing severe cognitive loafing. By evaluating 22,500 deterministic trajectories across 3 dataset contexts (GAIA, SWE-bench, Multi-Challenge) with 3 state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, we semantically audit internal reasoning traces against external outputs. We formalize the \textit{Interaction Depth Limit} ($D_L$), the exact plurality threshold where an agent's logical sovereignty collapses into social compliance. Crucially, we uncover the \textit{Sovereignty Gap}: models frequently compute the correct derivation internally but suffer ``Alignment Hallucinations'' -- actively subjugating empirical evidence to sycophantically appease a simulated swarm. We prove that multi-agent social load is strictly non-commutative; the "brand" identity of the ``Lead Anchor'' auditor disproportionately dictates the swarm's integrity. These findings expose architectural vulnerabilities, proving that unstructured multi-agent topologies can degrade independent reasoning.

cs.MA

CONCAT: Consensus- and Confidence-Driven Ad Hoc Teaming for Efficient LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

Although large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show their capability to solve complex tasks and achieve higher performance over single agent systems, they lead to huge computational overheads because of heavy communication between agents. Previous research has made efforts to train a sparse multi-agent graph or fine-tune a planner to orchestrate the workflow better. However, such extra training processes introduce computational costs and limit MAS to specific domains, therefore compromising their generalizability. In this paper, we propose CONCAT, a training-free multi-agent collaboration framework based on CONsensus and Confidence-driven Ad hoc Teaming to efficiently organize agent interactions. Specifically, agents are clustered based on their initial answers, and leaders of each cluster are selected based on the agents' confidence. Then, a heuristic function based on the Theory of Mind is designed to predict the collaboration benefits between every two leaders according to their answers and confidence. Finally, an ad hoc multi-agent network is organized after evicting a percentage of communications based on the predicted benefits. Experiments across three LLMs and three benchmarks show that CONCAT achieves up to 2.02x higher efficiency (accuracy/latency ratio) than LLM-Debate and outperforms training-aware methods such as AgentDropout, while reducing average latency by 50.1% on Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, without any task-specific training.

cs.MA