Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1911.01825

Unrecognized Sources of Uncertainties (USU) in Experimental Nuclear Data

R. Capote·S. Badikov·A. Carlson·I. Duran·F. Gunsing·D. Neudecker·V. G. Pronyaev·P. Schillebeeckx·G. Schnabel·D. L. Smith·A. Wallner
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Evaluated nuclear data uncertainties are often perceived as unrealistic, most often because they are thought to be too small. The impact of this issue in applied nuclear science has been discussed widely in recent years. Commonly suggested causes are: poor estimates of specific error components, neglect of uncertainty correlations, and overlooked known error sources. However, instances have been reported where very careful, objective assessments of all known error sources have been made with realistic error magnitudes and correlations provided, yet the resulting evaluated uncertainties still appear to be inconsistent with observed scatter of predicted mean values. These discrepancies might be attributed to significant unrecognized sources of uncertainty (USU) that limit the accuracy to which these physical quantities can be determined. The objective of our work has been to develop procedures for revealing and including USU estimates in nuclear data evaluations involving experimental input data. We conclude that the presence of USU may be revealed, and estimates of magnitudes made, through quantitative analyses. This paper identifies several specific clues that can be explored by evaluators in identifying the existence of USU. It then describes numerical procedures to generate quantitative estimates of USU magnitudes. Key requirements for these procedures to be viable are that sufficient numbers of data points be available, for statistical reasons, and that additional supporting information about the measurements be provided by the experimenters. Realistic examples are described to illustrate these procedures and demonstrate their outcomes as well as limitations. Our work strongly supports the view that USU is an important issue in nuclear data evaluation, with significant consequences for applications, and that this topic warrants further investigation by the nuclear science community.

Explore related subjects

physics.data-annucl-exnucl-th

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R. Capote, S. Badikov, A. Carlson, I. Duran, F. Gunsing, D. Neudecker, V. G. Pronyaev, P. Schillebeeckx, G. Schnabel, D. L. Smith, A. Wallner. 2019-11-02. Unrecognized Sources of Uncertainties (USU) in Experimental Nuclear Data. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2019.12.004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online local learning for generative thermodynamic computing

Generative thermodynamic computers turn thermal noise into structured data through Langevin dynamics. We train these systems with a local update at each integration step. The reverse-path Onsager-Machlup objective yields a coupling gradient that is a symmetric sum of local residual-state correlations. We apply this gradient immediately rather than accumulating it over a full trajectory. In digital simulations using MNIST prototypes, online and trajectory-batch training reach similar validation losses on fixed noising paths. Models trained online release less heat on average in all five independently seeded pairs, with both models' parameters held fixed during sampling. Auxiliary classifier and nearest-prototype measures change modestly, while pairwise diversity decreases. The response to noise depends strongly on where the errors enter: independent zero-mean errors in the formed updates produce little heat change over a finite range of noise amplitudes, whereas residual offset and temporal correlation have much larger effects. Storing trained couplings requires substantially less precision than resolving deterministic updates during training. Together, these results establish a local online training method and show how update timing, noise structure, and precision affect generative thermodynamic computing.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Information-Loss Location Estimation and Curvature-Scale Analysis of Physical Measurements: A Gaussian, Cauchy, and Logistic Neutron-Lifetime Benchmark

We develop and implement a two-step location-scale analysis for repeated physical measurements when the underlying distribution is not known. For a chosen substitute distribution, stationarity of population Kullback-Leibler information loss at fixed scale motivates the location score, which we apply to the observed measurements through empirical cross-entropy. Steiner's curvature rule then defines a companion scale separately. We place Gaussian, Cauchy, and logistic substitutes in one common construction and implement them reproducibly on a physics benchmark. For the logistic substitute, we pair the established bounded location score with a scale defined by the curvature rule rather than by a fitted tuning constant or a scale-likelihood equation. For Gaussian measurements with different quoted uncertainties, an experiment-level curvature convention and a stated variance mapping give an exact algebraic connection to a standard residual-based variance estimate for a weighted fit. Applied to a published 21-measurement neutron-lifetime compilation, the inverse-variance weighted, most frequent value, and logistic locations are 878.689, 881.164, and 882.835 s, respectively. These values are benchmark results of the compared constructions and are not proposed as a new recommended neutron lifetime.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Finite Asimov Sample Construction in Unbinned Neural Simulation-Based Inference

Expected sensitivity calculations in frequentist analysis using neural simulation-based inference often require large simulated samples to approximate an unbinned Asimov dataset. We construct a finite weighted reference sample, for analyses based on learned density ratios, for which the generating parameters globally maximize the weighted likelihood. A toy example with five-dimensional observable space based loosely on high-energy physics models shows that an Asimov dataset consisting of as few as 256 weighted reference events closely reproduce the expected test statistic scans obtained with two million simulated reference events. The resulting test statistic distributions are also shown to agree with independent simulator-based pseudo-experiments. We note that this agreement with the simulator depends on the accuracy of the learned ratios and must be validated explicitly.

physics.data-an↗