Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1911.01851

Lyndon words versus inverse Lyndon words: queries on suffixes and bordered words

Paola Bonizzoni·Clelia De Felice·Rocco Zaccagnino·Rosalba Zizza
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Lyndon words have been largely investigated and showned to be a useful tool to prove interesting combinatorial properties of words. In this paper we state new properties of both Lyndon and inverse Lyndon factorizations of a word $w$, with the aim of exploring their use in some classical queries on $w$. The main property we prove is related to a classical query on words. We prove that there are relations between the length of the longest common extension (or longest common prefix) $lcp(x,y)$ of two different suffixes $x,y$ of a word $w$ and the maximum length $\mathcal{M}$ of two consecutive factors of the inverse Lyndon factorization of $w$. More precisely, $\mathcal{M}$ is an upper bound on the length of $lcp(x,y)$. This result is in some sense stronger than the compatibility property, proved by Mantaci, Restivo, Rosone and Sciortino for the Lyndon factorization and here for the inverse Lyndon factorization. Roughly, the compatibility property allows us to extend the mutual order between local suffixes of (inverse) Lyndon factors to the suffixes of the whole word. A main tool used in the proof of the above results is a property that we state for factors $m_i$ with nonempty borders in an inverse Lyndon factorization: a nonempty border of $m_i$ cannot be a prefix of the next factor $m_{i+1}$. The last property we prove shows that if two words share a common overlap, then their Lyndon factorizations can be used to capture the common overlap of the two words. The above results open to the study of new applications of Lyndon words and inverse Lyndon words in the field of string comparison.

Explore related subjects

cs.FLmath.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paola Bonizzoni, Clelia De Felice, Rocco Zaccagnino, Rosalba Zizza. 2019-11-02. Lyndon words versus inverse Lyndon words: queries on suffixes and bordered words. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2020.10.034

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adding Reconfiguration to Zielonka's Asynchronous Automata

We study an extension of Zielonka's (fixed) asynchronous automata called reconfigurable asynchronous automata where processes can dynamically change who they communicate with. We show that reconfigurable asynchronous automata are not more expressive than fixed asynchronous automata by giving translations from one to the other. However, going from reconfigurable to fixed comes at the cost of disseminating communication (and knowledge) to all processes in the system. We then show that this is unavoidable by describing a language accepted by a reconfigurable automaton such that in every equivalent fixed automaton, every process must either be aware of all communication or be irrelevant.

cs.FL↗
arXiv2026

Certificates for short extending words in a finite automaton

Let $\mathcal A$ be a complete deterministic finite automaton on a state set $Q$ of size $n$ with $k$ letters, and for a proper nonempty subset $S$ of $Q$ let $\mathrm{minext}(S)$ be the length of a shortest word $u$ with $|Su^{-1}|>|S|$, where $Su^{-1}=\{q: q\cdot u\in S\}$. To each state $q$ attach the integer $β^{\ast}_q=\sum_{t=1}^{n-1}k^{\,n-1-t}(\mathrm{indeg}_t(q)-k^{t})$, where $\mathrm{indeg}_t(q)$ counts the pairs $(p,u)$ with $|u|=t$ and $p\cdot u=q$, and let $B(S)=\sum_{q\in S}β^{\ast}_q$. On every synchronizing automaton, $B(S)\ge0$ implies $\mathrm{minext}(S)\le n-1$, so, as $B(Q)=0$, one of $S$ and $Q\setminus S$ extends within $n-1$; when $B(S)>0$ no hypothesis is needed. Kari's Eulerian extension lemma is the case $β^{\ast}=0$, and $β^{\ast}$, like every member of the family $\sum_{t=1}^{n-1}c_tσ_t$, $c_t>0$, vanishes identically if and only if the automaton is Eulerian, where $σ_t(S)=\sum_{q\in S}(\mathrm{indeg}_t(q)-k^{t})$. On strongly connected automata $σ_t(S)/k^{t}$ has Cesàro limit $n\,e(S)/e(Q)-|S|$ for Friedman's weight $e$; that limit certifies singletons but no larger subset in general. The hypothesis $B(S)\ge0$ cannot be relaxed by one integer unit, nor can the constant $n-1$ be improved. A second-moment test on the sizes $|Su^{-1}|$ certifies 60 to 95 percent of the subsets with $B(S)<0$ at $n\le7$. Along non-Eulerian automata whose words of length $n-1$ merge a fraction of the state pairs bounded below, with $\max_q\mathrm{indeg}_{n-1}(q)=o(nk^{n-1})$, it certifies all but a vanishing share of them. The functional $B$ certifies half of the subsets outside $\{B=0\}$. At each subset size coprime to $n$ ($n\ge4$) some synchronizing Eulerian binary automaton attains the constant $n-1$; whether only there is open. No reset bound follows: Černý's automata have subsets not extending within $n-1$.

cs.FL↗
arXiv2026

Quadratic Word Equations with a Linear Side: Polynomial Nielsen Graph Diameter and NP-Completeness

The satisfiability problem for word equations asks whether variables can be replaced by words so that the two sides become equal. For regular word equations, in which each variable occurs at most once on each side, satisfiability is NP-complete. For general quadratic word equations, in which each variable occurs at most twice in total, satisfiability is NP-hard, but its membership in NP remains open. We consider an intermediate class: quadratic word equations with a linear side, where each variable occurs at most once on one designated side. We show that the Nielsen graph of an equation $U=V$ in this class, with total length $N=|U|+|V|$, has diameter $O(N^{12})$, measured over reachable pairs of vertices. Together with the known NP-hardness for regular word equations, this result establishes NP-completeness of satisfiability for this class.

cs.FL↗