Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1911.04344

Bunch theory: working notes on applications, axioms and models

Abstract

In his book A Practical Theory of Programming, Eric Hehner proposes and applies a remarkably radical reformulation of set theory, in which the collection and packaging of elements are seen as separate activities. This provides for unpackaged collections, referred to as bunches. Bunches allow us to reason about non-determinism at the level of terms, and, very remarkably, allow us to reason about the conceptual entity nothing, which is just an empty bunch (and very different from an empty set). This eliminates mathematical gaps caused by undefined terms. We compare the use of bunches with other approaches to this problem, and we illustrate the use of Bunch Theory in formulating program semantics combining non-deterministic, preferential, and probabilistic choice to provide a guarded command language whose exceptional expressivity we illustrate with a short case study. We show how an existing axiomatisation of set theory can be extended to incorporate bunches, and we provide and validate a model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bill Stoddart, Frank Zeyda, Steve Dunne. 2022-04-25. Bunch theory: working notes on applications, axioms and models. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.04344

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO