Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1912.03527

Dances between continuous and discrete: Euler's summation formula

Abstract

Leonhard Euler likely developed his summation formula in 1732, and soon used it to estimate the sum of the reciprocal squares to 14 digits --- a value mathematicians had been competing to determine since Leibniz's astonishing discovery that the alternating sum of the reciprocal odd numbers is exactly $π/4$. This competition came to be known as the Basel Problem, and Euler's approximation probably spurred his spectacular solution in the same year. Subsequently he connected his summation formula to Bernoulli numbers, and applied it to many other topics, masterfully circumventing that it almost always diverges. He applied it to estimate harmonic series partial sums, the gamma constant, and sums of logarithms, thereby calculating large factorials (Stirling's series) with ease. He even commented that his approximation of $ π$ was surprisingly accurate for so little work. All this is beautifully presented in mature form in Euler's book Institutiones Calculi Differentialis. I have translated extensive selections for annotated publication as teaching source material in a book Mathematics Masterpieces; Further Chronicles by the Explorers, featuring original sources. I will summarize and illustrate Euler's achievements, including the connection to the search for formulas for sums of numerical powers. I will show in his own words Euler's idea for deriving his summation formula, and how he applied the formula to the sum of reciprocal squares and other situations, e.g., large factorials and binomial coefficients. Finally, I will discuss further mathematical questions, e.g., approximation of factorials, arising from Euler's writings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David J. Pengelley. 2019-12-07. Dances between continuous and discrete: Euler's summation formula. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On the Reconstruction of SAS from Other Triangle Congruence Criteria, Part II: Eliminating the Pons Asinorum

In the first part of this work we showed that, within a Hilbert plane deprived of the Side-Angle-Side axiom, the Side-Angle-Angle criterion, together with a ray correspondence principle [\textbf{RCT}], the existence of angle bisectors [\textbf{AB}], the congruence of supplements of congruent angles [\textbf{SA}], and the Pons Asinorum [\textbf{PA}], suffices to reconstruct SAS. We left open the question of whether [\textbf{PA}] is genuinely required alongside the other three principles, noting only a qualitative asymmetry in the nature of the principles involved. In this second part we answer this question: we show that \begin{equation*} \textrm{SAA},\ [\textbf{RCT}],\ [\textbf{AB}] \;\vdash\; [\textbf{PA}], \end{equation*} so that [\textbf{PA}] is redundant among the hypotheses of our main theorem, which improves to \begin{equation*} \textrm{SAA},\ [\textbf{RCT}],\ [\textbf{AB}],\ [\textbf{SA}] \;\vdash\; \textrm{SAS}. \end{equation*} The proof adapts an argument recently given by Donnelly, who reconstructs SAS from SAA together with an angle addition axiom and the existence of angle bisectors.

math.HO

Chebyshev and garment cutting. Debunking some myths

In {\tt 1878}, Pafnuty Chebyshev presented to the {\it Association fran\c caise pour l'avan\-cement des sciences} {\it [French Association for the Advancement of the Sciences]} an article \cite{Chebyshev1878} dealing with garment cutting. According to Chebyshev himself, his interest was sparked by a lecture given by Édouard Lucas that he had attended in {\tt 1876} \cite{Lucas1876}. There is a second story on the origin of Chebyshev's interest in garment cutting according to which in the 1850s, being short of money, Chebyshev got himself a job as a consultant to a clothing factory. At the time of the Crimean War (1853-1856), there was a great demand for uniforms. Chebyshev was allegedly asked to optimize the use of fabric, and it was there that his interest in garment cutting was born. This second story appears to have its origin in a post by Clive J. Grant to MacTutor in 1996 \cite{Grant1996}. However, this contribution contains no references, and no other source of information that I have found offers any first-hand documentation to support this story. Our conclusion is that this second story is a fabrication, invented out of whole cloth.

math.HO

Mathematics Graduate Training in the Age of AI

Generative AI changes the conditions under which graduate mathematics is learned, assessed, written, and defended. The central claim of this paper is that mathematics graduate programs should respond to the moment by clarifying what graduate mathematics education is trying to teach and assess. In most ways, the goals of mathematics education have not changed. Rather, with changing tools it has become more essential than ever to make clear the goals of mathematical training. We use the term mathematical judgment to refer to the capacity to evaluate mathematics (e.g., claims, definitions, examples, proofs, analogies, computations, uses of tools, research directions) as mathematically sound, useful, well-posed, and appropriately justified. The recommendation is to center training on mathematical judgment, and we examine possible policies for graduate programs in Mathematics to this end.

math.HO