Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2001.10801

Fully-Dynamic All-Pairs Shortest Paths: Improved Worst-Case Time and Space Bounds

Maximilian Probst Gutenberg·Christian Wulff-Nilsen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a directed weighted graph $G=(V,E)$ undergoing vertex insertions \emph{and} deletions, the All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem asks to maintain a data structure that processes updates efficiently and returns after each update the distance matrix to the current version of $G$. In two breakthrough results, Italiano and Demetrescu [STOC '03] presented an algorithm that requires $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ \emph{amortized} update time, and Thorup showed in [STOC '05] that \emph{worst-case} update time $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/4})$ can be achieved. In this article, we make substantial progress on the problem. We present the following new results: (1) We present the first deterministic data structure that breaks the $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/4})$ worst-case update time bound by Thorup which has been standing for almost 15 years. We improve the worst-case update time to $\tilde{O}(n^{2+5/7}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.71..})$ and to $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/5}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.6})$ for unweighted graphs. (2) We present a simple deterministic algorithm with $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/4})$ worst-case update time ($\tilde{O}(n^{2+2/3})$ for unweighted graphs), and a simple Las-Vegas algorithm with worst-case update time $\tilde{O}(n^{2+2/3})$ ($\tilde{O}(n^{2 + 1/2})$ for unweighted graphs) that works against a non-oblivious adversary. Both data structures require space $\tilde{O}(n^2)$. These are the first exact dynamic algorithms with truly-subcubic update time \emph{and} space usage. This makes significant progress on an open question posed in multiple articles [COCOON'01, STOC '03, ICALP'04, Encyclopedia of Algorithms '08] and is critical to algorithms in practice [TALG '06] where large space usage is prohibitive. Moreover, they match the worst-case update time of the best previous algorithms and the second algorithm improves upon a Monte-Carlo algorithm in a weaker adversary model with the same running time [SODA '17].

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Christian Wulff-Nilsen. 2020-02-19. Fully-Dynamic All-Pairs Shortest Paths: Improved Worst-Case Time and Space Bounds. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975994.156

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Linear-Query Deterministic Approximation for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization under a Knapsack Constraint

Submodular maximization under a knapsack constraint (SMK) is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with broad applications across machine learning and data mining. Motivated by large-scale applications where query efficiency is paramount, we study non-monotone SMK and focus on deterministic algorithms with linear query complexity. Prior deterministic linear-query algorithms achieve at best a $1/5-\varepsilon$ approximation, falling short of the $1/4-\varepsilon$ ratio attainable by randomized algorithms. We close this gap by presenting a deterministic $(1/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation with $O(n\log^2(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries. Our approach partitions the analysis based on the cost of the largest optimal element $r$: when the cost of $r$ is moderate, we refine the threshold-twin-greedy framework via residual-budget enumeration to tighten the analysis; when the cost of $r$ is large, we reduce the problem to bicriteria submodular maximization. As a secondary contribution, we obtain a $(1/2-\varepsilon, O(1/\varepsilon))$-bicriteria approximation with $O(n\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries, improving over the previous $O(n^2/\varepsilon)$ query bound.

cs.DS↗