Work-efficient Batch-incremental Minimum Spanning Trees with Applications to the Sliding Window Model

Daniel Anderson; Guy E. Blelloch; Kanat Tangwongsan

doi:10.1145/3350755.3400241

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2002.05710

Work-efficient Batch-incremental Minimum Spanning Trees with Applications to the Sliding Window Model

Daniel Anderson·Guy E. Blelloch·Kanat Tangwongsan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Algorithms for dynamically maintaining minimum spanning trees (MSTs) have received much attention in both the parallel and sequential settings. While previous work has given optimal algorithms for dense graphs, all existing parallel batch-dynamic algorithms perform polynomial work per update in the worst case for sparse graphs. In this paper, we present the first work-efficient parallel batch-dynamic algorithm for incremental MST, which can insert $\ell$ edges in $O(\ell \log(1+n/\ell))$ work in expectation and $O(\text{polylog}(n))$ span w.h.p. The key ingredient of our algorithm is an algorithm for constructing a compressed path tree of an edge-weighted tree, which is a smaller tree that contains all pairwise heaviest edges between a given set of marked vertices. Using our batch-incremental MST algorithm, we demonstrate a range of applications that become efficiently solvable in parallel in the sliding-window model, such as graph connectivity, approximate MSTs, testing bipartiteness, $k$-certificates, cycle-freeness, and maintaining sparsifiers.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Daniel Anderson, Guy E. Blelloch, Kanat Tangwongsan. 2020-02-13. Work-efficient Batch-incremental Minimum Spanning Trees with Applications to the Sliding Window Model. https://doi.org/10.1145/3350755.3400241

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗