Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2002.07463

Coreset-based Strategies for Robust Center-type Problems

Abstract

Given a dataset $V$ of points from some metric space, the popular $k$-center problem requires to identify a subset of $k$ points (centers) in $V$ minimizing the maximum distance of any point of $V$ from its closest center. The \emph{robust} formulation of the problem features a further parameter $z$ and allows up to $z$ points of $V$ (outliers) to be disregarded when computing the maximum distance from the centers. In this paper, we focus on two important constrained variants of the robust $k$-center problem, namely, the Robust Matroid Center (RMC) problem, where the set of returned centers are constrained to be an independent set of a matroid of rank $k$ built on $V$, and the Robust Knapsack Center (RKC) problem, where each element $i\in V$ is given a positive weight $w_i<1$ and the aggregate weight of the returned centers must be at most 1. We devise coreset-based strategies for the two problems which yield efficient sequential, MapReduce, and Streaming algorithms. More specifically, for any fixed $\epsilon>0$, the algorithms return solutions featuring a $(3+\epsilon)$-approximation ratio, which is a mere additive term $\epsilon$ away from the 3-approximations achievable by the best known polynomial-time sequential algorithms for the two problems. Moreover, the algorithms obliviously adapt to the intrinsic complexity of the dataset, captured by its doubling dimension $D$. For wide ranges of the parameters $k,z,\epsilon, D$, we obtain a sequential algorithm with running time linear in $|V|$, and MapReduce/Streaming algorithms with few rounds/passes and substantially sublinear local/working memory.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrea Pietracaprina, Geppino Pucci, Federico Soldà. 2020-02-18. Coreset-based Strategies for Robust Center-type Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07463

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS