Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2003.00518

The Maximum-Level Vertex in an Arrangement of Lines

Abstract

Let $L$ be a set of $n$ lines in the plane, not necessarily in general position. We present an efficient algorithm for finding all the vertices of the arrangement $A(L)$ of maximum level, where the level of a vertex $v$ is the number of lines of $L$ that pass strictly below $v$. The problem, posed in Exercise~8.13 in de Berg etal [BCKO08], appears to be much harder than it seems, as this vertex might not be on the upper envelope of the lines. We first assume that all the lines of $L$ are distinct, and distinguish between two cases, depending on whether or not the upper envelope of $L$ contains a bounded edge. In the former case, we show that the number of lines of $L$ that pass above any maximum level vertex $v_0$ is only $O(\log n)$. In the latter case, we establish a similar property that holds after we remove some of the lines that are incident to the single vertex of the upper envelope. We present algorithms that run, in both cases, in optimal $O(n\log n)$ time. We then consider the case where the lines of $L$ are not necessarily distinct. This setup is more challenging, and the best we have is an algorithm that computes all the maximum-level vertices in time $O(n^{4/3}\log^{3}n)$. Finally, we consider a related combinatorial question for degenerate arrangements, where many lines may intersect in a single point, but all the lines are distinct: We bound the complexity of the weighted $k$-level in such an arrangement, where the weight of a vertex is the number of lines that pass through the vertex. We show that the bound in this case is $O(n^{4/3})$, which matches the corresponding bound for non-degenerate arrangements, and we use this bound in the analysis of one of our algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dan Halperin, Sariel Har-Peled, Kurt Mehlhorn, Eunjin Oh, Micha Sharir. 2020-03-01. The Maximum-Level Vertex in an Arrangement of Lines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00518

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG