Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2003.05582

$λ_\infty$ & Maximum Variance Embedding: Measuring and Optimizing Connectivity of A Graph Metric

Abstract

Bobkov, Houdré, and the last author [2000] introduced a Poincaré-type functional parameter, $λ_\infty$, of a graph and related it to connectivity of the graph via Cheeger-type inequalities. A work by the second author, Raghavendra, and Vempala [2013] related the complexity of $λ_\infty$ to the so-called small-set expansion (SSE) problem and further set forth the desiderata for NP-hardness of this optimization problem. We confirm the conjecture that computing $λ_\infty$ is NP-hard for weighted trees. Beyond measuring connectivity in many applications we want to optimize it. This, via convex duality, leads to a problem in machine learning known as the Maximum Variance Embedding (MVE). The output is a function from vertices to a low dim Euclidean space, subject to bounds on Euclidean distances between neighbors. The objective is to maximize output variance. Special cases of MVE into $n$ and $1$ dims lead to absolute algebraic connectivity [1990] and spread constant [1998], that measure connectivity of the graph and its Cartesian $n$-power, respectively. MVE has other applications in measuring diffusion speed and robustness of networks, clustering, and dimension reduction. We show that computing MVE in tree-width dims is NP-hard, while only one additional dim beyond width of a given tree-decomposition makes the problem in P. We show that MVE of a tree in 2 dims defines a non-convex yet benign optimization landscape, i.e., local=global optima. We further develop a linear time combinatorial algorithm for this case. Finally, we denote approximate Maximum Variance Embedding is tractable in significantly lower dims. For trees and general graphs, for which Maximum Variance Embedding cannot be solved in less than $2$ and $Ω(n)$ dims, we provide $1+\varepsilon$ approximation algorithms for embedding into $1$ and $O(\log n /\varepsilon^2)$ dims, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Majid Farhadi, Anand Louis, Mohit Singh, Prasad Tetali. 2022-07-01. $λ_\infty$ & Maximum Variance Embedding: Measuring and Optimizing Connectivity of A Graph Metric. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.05582

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC