Miniature Robot Path Planning for Bridge Inspection: Min-Max Cycle Cover-Based Approach

Michael Lin; Richard J. La

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2003.12134

Miniature Robot Path Planning for Bridge Inspection: Min-Max Cycle Cover-Based Approach

Michael Lin·Richard J. La

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the problem of planning the deployments of a group of mobile robots. While the problem and formulation can be used for many different problems, here we use a bridge inspection as the motivating application for the purpose of exposition. The robots are initially stationed at a set of depots placed throughout the bridge. Each robot is then assigned a set of sites on the bridge to inspect and, upon completion, must return to the same depot where it is stored. The problem of robot planning is formulated as a rooted min-max cycle cover problem, in which the vertex set consists of the sites to be inspected and robot depots, and the weight of an edge captures either (i) the amount of time needed to travel from one end vertex to the other vertex or (ii) the necessary energy expenditure for the travel. In the first case, the objective function is the total inspection time, whereas in the latter case, it is the maximum energy expenditure among all deployed robots. We propose a novel algorithm with approximation ratio of $5 + \epsilon$, where $0<\epsilon<1$. In addition, the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm is shown to be $O\big( n^2+2^{m-1} n \log(n+k) \big)$, where $n$ is the number of vertices, and $m$ is the number of depots.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS math.OC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Michael Lin, Richard J. La. 2020-03-06. Miniature Robot Path Planning for Bridge Inspection: Min-Max Cycle Cover-Based Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12134

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗