Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2004.05333

Bit-Parallel Vector Composability for Neural Acceleration

Soroush Ghodrati·Hardik Sharma·Cliff Young·Nam Sung Kim·Hadi Esmaeilzadeh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Conventional neural accelerators rely on isolated self-sufficient functional units that perform an atomic operation while communicating the results through an operand delivery-aggregation logic. Each single unit processes all the bits of their operands atomically and produce all the bits of the results in isolation. This paper explores a different design style, where each unit is only responsible for a slice of the bit-level operations to interleave and combine the benefits of bit-level parallelism with the abundant data-level parallelism in deep neural networks. A dynamic collection of these units cooperate at runtime to generate bits of the results, collectively. Such cooperation requires extracting new grouping between the bits, which is only possible if the operands and operations are vectorizable. The abundance of Data Level Parallelism and mostly repeated execution patterns, provides a unique opportunity to define and leverage this new dimension of Bit-Parallel Vector Composability. This design intersperses bit parallelism within data-level parallelism and dynamically interweaves the two together. As such, the building block of our neural accelerator is a Composable Vector Unit that is a collection of Narrower-Bitwidth Vector Engines, which are dynamically composed or decomposed at the bit granularity. Using six diverse CNN and LSTM deep networks, we evaluate this design style across four design points: with and without algorithmic bitwidth heterogeneity and with and without availability of a high-bandwidth off-chip memory. Across these four design points, Bit-Parallel Vector Composability brings (1.4x to 3.5x) speedup and (1.1x to 2.7x) energy reduction. We also comprehensively compare our design style to the Nvidia RTX 2080 TI GPU, which also supports INT-4 execution. The benefits range between 28.0x and 33.7x improvement in Performance-per-Watt.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.PF

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soroush Ghodrati, Hardik Sharma, Cliff Young, Nam Sung Kim, Hadi Esmaeilzadeh. 2020-04-11. Bit-Parallel Vector Composability for Neural Acceleration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05333

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗