Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2004.10776

Scheduling Precedence-Constrained Jobs on Related Machines with Communication Delay

Biswaroop Maiti·Rajmohan Rajaraman·David Stalfa·Zoya Svitkina·Aravindan Vijayaraghavan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the problem of scheduling $n$ precedence-constrained jobs on $m$ uniformly-related machines in the presence of an arbitrary, fixed communication delay $\rho$. We consider a model that allows job duplication, i.e. processing of the same job on multiple machines, which, as we show, can reduce the length of a schedule (i.e., its makespan) by a logarithmic factor. Our main result is an $O(\log m \log \rho / \log \log \rho)$-approximation algorithm for minimizing makespan, assuming the minimum makespan is at least $\rho$. Our algorithm is based on rounding a linear programming relaxation for the problem, which includes carefully designed constraints capturing the interaction among communication delay, precedence requirements, varying speeds, and job duplication. Our result builds on two previous lines of work, one with communication delay but identical machines (Lepere, Rapine 2002) and the other with uniformly-related machines but no communication delay (Chudak, Shmoys 1999). We next show that the integrality gap of our mathematical program is $\Omega(\sqrt{\log \rho})$. Our gap construction employs expander graphs and exploits a property of robust expansion and its generalization to paths of longer length. Finally, we quantify the advantage of duplication in scheduling with communication delay. We show that the best schedule without duplication can have makespan $\Omega(\rho/\log \rho)$ or $\Omega(\log m/\log\log m)$ or $\Omega(\log n/\log \log n)$ times that of an optimal schedule allowing duplication. Nevertheless, we present a polynomial time algorithm to transform any schedule to a schedule without duplication at the cost of a $O(\log^2 n \log m)$ factor increase in makespan. Together with our makespan approximation algorithm for schedules allowing duplication, this also yields a polylogarithmic-approximation algorithm for the setting where duplication is not allowed.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Biswaroop Maiti, Rajmohan Rajaraman, David Stalfa, Zoya Svitkina, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan. 2020-04-22. Scheduling Precedence-Constrained Jobs on Related Machines with Communication Delay. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10776

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗