Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2004.12223

Online MinCut: Competitive and Regret Analysis

Avah Banerjee·Guoli Ding
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we study the mincut problem in the online setting. We consider two distinct models: A) competitive analysis and B) regret analysis. In the competitive setting we consider the vertex arrival model; whenever a new vertex arrives it's neighborhood with respect to the set of known vertices is revealed. An online algorithm must make an irrevocable decision to determine the side of the cut that the vertex must belong to in order to minimize the size of the final cut. Various models are considered. 1) For classical and advice models we give tight bounds on the competitive ratio of deterministic algorithms. 2) Next we consider few semi-adversarial inputs: random order of arrival with adversarially generated and sparse graphs. 3) Lastly we derive some structural properties of \mc-type problems with respect to greedy strategies. Finally we consider a non-stationary regret setting with a variational budget $V_T$ and give tights bounds on the regret function. Specifically, we show that if $V_T$ is sublinear in $T$ (number of rounds) then there is a deterministic algorithm achieving a sublinear regret bound ($O(V_T)$). Further, this is optimal, even if randomization is allowed.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Avah Banerjee, Guoli Ding. 2020-04-25. Online MinCut: Competitive and Regret Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.12223

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗