Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2005.01381

Synchronizing Deterministic Push-Down Automata Can Be Really Hard

Abstract

The question if a deterministic finite automaton admits a software reset in the form of a so-called synchronizing word can be answered in polynomial time. In this paper, we extend this algorithmic question to deterministic automata beyond finite automata. We prove that the question of synchronizability becomes undecidable even when looking at deterministic one-counter automata. This is also true for another classical mild extension of regularity, namely that of deterministic one-turn push-down automata. However, when we combine both restrictions, we arrive at scenarios with a PSPACE-complete (and hence decidable) synchronizability problem. Likewise, we arrive at a decidable synchronizability problem for (partially) blind deterministic counter automata. There are several interpretations of what synchronizability should mean for deterministic push-down automata. This is depending on the role of the stack: should it be empty on synchronization, should it be always the same or is it arbitrary? For the automata classes studied in this paper, the complexity or decidability status of the synchronizability problem is mostly independent of this technicality, but we also discuss one class of automata where this makes a difference.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Henning Fernau, Petra Wolf, Tomoyuki Yamakami. 2020-12-22. Synchronizing Deterministic Push-Down Automata Can Be Really Hard. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01381

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Simple grammar bisimilarity, with an application to session type equivalence

We provide an algorithm for deciding simple grammar bisimilarity whose complexity is polynomial in the valuation of the grammar (maximum seminorm among production rules). Since the valuation is at most exponential in the size of the grammar, this gives rise to a (single) exponential running time. Previously only a double-exponential algorithm was known. As an application, we provide a conversion from context-free session types to simple grammars whose valuation is linear in the size of the type. In this way, we provide the first polynomial-time algorithm for deciding context-free session type equivalence.

cs.FL

Testing and Learning Symbolic Finite State Machines

Symbolic finite state machines (SFSMs) describe input/output behaviour using guards and output assignments with possibly infinite data domains. We study deterministic and completely specified SFSMs whose guards and output assignments depend only on the current input. We define finite representative input sets that contain witnesses for relevant guard overlaps and separating witnesses for output assignments that differ on those overlaps. Our main theorem shows that language equivalence of the finite instantiations implies language equivalence over the full input domain. This result transfers complete testing methods for deterministic finite state machines (DFSMs) to SFSMs, provided finite sets of admissible guards and output assignments and an upper bound on the number of distinguishable reachable states are known. Under these assumptions, a DFSM learner with complete testing can learn a finite instantiation, which is then lifted to an equivalent SFSM. We establish a bound on the size of representative input sets and give an SMT construction whose correctness and termination hold under stated solver assumptions.

cs.FL

A Myhill-Nerode Theorem for Generalized Automata, with Applications to Pattern Matching and Compression

The model of generalized automata, introduced by Eilenberg in 1974, allows representing a regular language more concisely than conventional automata by allowing edges to be labeled not only with characters, but also strings. Giammarresi and Montalbano introduced a notion of determinism for generalized automata [STACS 1995]. While generalized deterministic automata retain many properties of conventional deterministic automata, the uniqueness of a minimal generalized deterministic automaton is lost. In the first part of the paper, we show that the lack of uniqueness can be explained by introducing a set $ \mathcal{W(A)} $ associated with a generalized automaton $ \mathcal{A} $. In this way, we derive for the first time a full Myhill-Nerode theorem for generalized automata, which contains the textbook Myhill-Nerode theorem for conventional automata as a degenerate case. In the second part of the paper, we show that the set $ \mathcal{W(A)} $ leads to applications for pattern matching and data compression. We show that a Wheeler generalized automata can be stored using $ \mathfrak{e} \log σ(1 + o(1)) + O(e) $ bits so that pattern matching queries can be solved in $ O(m \log \log σ) $ time, where $ \mathfrak{e} $ is the total length of all edge labels, $ e $ is the number of edges, $ σ$ is the size of the alphabet and $ m $ is the length of the pattern.

cs.FL