Benchmarking of Numerical Models for Wave Overtopping at Dikes with Shallow Mildly Sloping Foreshores: Accuracy versus Speed

Abstract

To accurately predict the consequences of nearshore waves, coastal engineers often employ numerical models. A variety of these models, broadly classified as either phase-resolving or phase-averaged, exist; each with strengths and limitations owing to the physical schematization of processes within them. Models which resolve the vertical flow structure or the full wave spectrum (i.e. sea-swell (SS) and infragravity (IG) waves) are considered more accurate, but also more computationally demanding than those with approximations. Here, we assess the speed-accuracy trade-off of six well-known wave models for overtopping (q), under shallow foreshore conditions. The results demonstrate that: i) q is underestimated by an order of magnitude when IG waves are neglected; ii) using more computationally-demanding models does not guarantee more accurate results; and iii) with empirical corrections to account for IG waves, phase-averaged models like SWAN can perform on par, if not better than, phase-resolving models but with far less computational effort.