Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2007.01808

On differences between consecutive numbers coprime to primorials

Abstract

We consider the ordered sequence of coprimes to a given primorial number and investigate differences between consecutive elements. The Jacobsthal function applied to the concerning primorial turns out to represent the greatest of these differences. We will explore the smallest even number which does not occur as such a difference. Little is known about even natural numbers below the respective Jacobsthal function which cannot be represented as a difference between consecutive numbers coprime to a primorial. Existence and frequency of these numbers have not yet been clarified. Using the relation between restricted coverings of sequences of consecutive integers and the occuring differences, we derive a bound below which all even natural numbers are differences between consecutive numbers coprime to a given primorial $p_k\#$. Furthermore, we provide exhaustive computational results on non-existent differences for primes $p_k$ up to $k=44$. The data suggest the assumption that all even natural numbers up to $h(k-1)$ occur as differences of coprimes to $p_k\#$ where $h(n)$ is the Jacobsthal function applied to $p_n\#$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mario Ziller. 2020-07-03. On differences between consecutive numbers coprime to primorials. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01808

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT