Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2007.12762

Sublinear-Time Algorithms for Computing & Embedding Gap Edit Distance

Abstract

In this paper, we design new sublinear-time algorithms for solving the gap edit distance problem and for embedding edit distance to Hamming distance. For the gap edit distance problem, we give an $\tilde{O}(\frac{n}{k}+k^2)$-time greedy algorithm that distinguishes between length-$n$ input strings with edit distance at most $k$ and those with edit distance exceeding $(3k+5)k$. This is an improvement and a simplification upon the result of Goldenberg, Krauthgamer, and Saha [FOCS 2019], where the $k$ vs $\Theta(k^2)$ gap edit distance problem is solved in $\tilde{O}(\frac{n}{k}+k^3)$ time. We further generalize our result to solve the $k$ vs $k'$ gap edit distance problem in time $\tilde{O}(\frac{nk}{k'}+k^2+ \frac{k^2}{k'}\sqrt{nk})$, strictly improving upon the previously known bound $\tilde{O}(\frac{nk}{k'}+k^3)$. Finally, we show that if the input strings do not have long highly periodic substrings, then already the $k$ vs $(1+\epsilon)k$ gap edit distance problem can be solved in sublinear time. Specifically, if the strings contain no substring of length $\ell$ with period at most $2k$, then the running time we achieve is $\tilde{O}(\frac{n}{\epsilon^2 k}+k^2\ell)$. We further give the first sublinear-time probabilistic embedding of edit distance to Hamming distance. For any parameter $p$, our $\tilde{O}(\frac{n}{p})$-time procedure yields an embedding with distortion $O(kp)$, where $k$ is the edit distance of the original strings. Specifically, the Hamming distance of the resultant strings is between $\frac{k-p+1}{p+1}$ and $O(k^2)$ with good probability. This generalizes the linear-time embedding of Chakraborty, Goldenberg, and Kouck\'y [STOC 2016], where the resultant Hamming distance is between $\frac k2$ and $O(k^2)$. Our algorithm is based on a random walk over samples, which we believe will find other applications in sublinear-time algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tomasz Kociumaka, Barna Saha. 2020-07-24. Sublinear-Time Algorithms for Computing & Embedding Gap Edit Distance. https://doi.org/10.1109/focs46700.2020.00112

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS