Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2008.11845

FCN Approach for Dynamically Locating Multiple Speakers

Hodaya Hammer·Shlomo E. Chazan·Jacob Goldberger·Sharon Gannot
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we present a deep neural network-based online multi-speaker localisation algorithm. Following the W-disjoint orthogonality principle in the spectral domain, each time-frequency (TF) bin is dominated by a single speaker, and hence by a single direction of arrival (DOA). A fully convolutional network is trained with instantaneous spatial features to estimate the DOA for each TF bin. The high resolution classification enables the network to accurately and simultaneously localize and track multiple speakers, both static and dynamic. Elaborated experimental study using both simulated and real-life recordings in static and dynamic scenarios, confirms that the proposed algorithm outperforms both classic and recent deep-learning-based algorithms.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.LGcs.SD

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hodaya Hammer, Shlomo E. Chazan, Jacob Goldberger, Sharon Gannot. 2020-08-26. FCN Approach for Dynamically Locating Multiple Speakers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11845

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AURA: Uncertainty-Routed Activation Editing for Acoustic Grounding in Speech Foundation Models

Attention encoder-decoder (AED) Speech Foundation Models achieve strong ASR performance but can generate acoustically unsupported text when inputs contain no speech, weak acoustic evidence, or unreliable transcription. We propose AURA: Activation-editing with Uncertainty-Routed Adaptation, an ultra-efficient representation-editing method that freezes the pretrained model and applies sparse scale-and-shift edits to decoder cross-attention heads. AURA dynamically routes edits using cross-attention uncertainty features that capture over-concentration, diffuse attention, and abrupt frame shifts. We evaluate AURA on four datasets spanning non-speech hallucination and speech grounding stressors, including imperfect-label child speech, imperfect-label adult speech, and disfluent speech. On non-speech audio, AURA reduces hallucination rate from 89.18% to 1.94% without prior hallucination-head identification. On imperfect-label corpora, AURA approaches LoRA WER while using roughly 500x fewer trainable parameters. Sensitivity analysis and qualitative cross-attention examples are consistent with AURA's uncertainty-routed editing behavior, supporting dynamic activation editing as a practical path for grounding AED speech models.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

LLM can Read Spectrogram: Encoder-free Speech-Language Modeling

Recent speech-aware large language models (Speech-LLMs) rely on pre-trained speech encoders to convert audio into semantic/acoustic rich representations consumable by LLM. In this work, instead, we explore: can an LLM learn to read Mel spectrogram directly without a dedicated speech encoder? We propose Mel-LLM, an encoder-free Speech-LLM that feeds lightly pre-processed Mel-spectrogram patches directly into the LLM through a linear projection, allowing the LLM to learn speech-text alignment purely through its own parameters. We focus on speech understanding tasks, including automatic speech recognition (ASR), spoken QA and audio understanding. For ASR, we evaluate on the OpenASR Leaderboard public sets and production-level scaling experiments, demonstrating that the encoder-free solution achieves competitive performance with only limited degradation compared to encoder-initialized counterparts. We find that when data is limited, initialization from a multimodal checkpoint (Phi-4-MM) is crucial for maintaining performance. We also present ablation studies suggesting which LLM layers are most involved in speech adaptation. Beyond ASR, we extend Mel-LLM with general speech/audio understanding tasks, revealing an acoustic-semantic trade-off: directly exposing the LLM to Mel-spectrogram input improves paralinguistic and non-ASR acoustic tasks, while knowledge-intensive spoken QA remains more challenging than encoder-anchored systems. We additionally include a text-to-speech (TTS) proof-of-concept with a next-token VAE decoder, showing that direct Mel generation is possible but still trails stronger latent-diffusion generation.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

When and why do handcrafted cues help self-supervised anti-spoofing? A causal and faithfulness analysis

Most spoofing countermeasures now place a light classifier on top of a self-supervised (SSL) speech encoder. A growing line of work adds handcrafted acoustic features and fuses them by cross-attention, partly because the attention weights appear to explain which cues the model relies on. Two things about such fusion remain untested: whether the handcrafted features contribute anything once a strong SSL encoder is already in place, and whether the attention map faithfully reflects what the classifier actually uses. We study both questions with MOSAIC, a single model that handles logical access (LA) and physical access (PA) attacks by projecting a 152-dimensional biophonetic vector into six query tokens attending over thirteen intermediate layers of WavLM-Large. Rather than pursuing state-of-the-art accuracy, we treat the model itself as the object of analysis and apply inference-time interventions that zero out selected components. Removing the handcrafted branch lowers the EER by 0.67 percentage points under LA, so WavLM alone is sufficient there, but raises it by 0.76 points under PA, where the branch supplies replay channel evidence the encoder does not carry. The 6x13 attention map is highly stable under resampling (bootstrap rank correlation 0.99), yet its faithfulness varies by domain: layer attention weights predict the causal importance of each layer under PA (rho = +0.62) but not under LA (rho = -0.28). The handcrafted branch and its attention-based explanation are therefore trustworthy for replay attacks and not for synthetic ones. On standard benchmarks the model is mid-range on LA and ahead of the official baselines on cross-source deepfakes (6.21% EER on ASVspoof 2021 DF). The contribution is not a new architecture but a checking procedure: verify handcrafted cues and attention maps by intervention before trusting either.

eess.AS↗