Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2009.03171

Semantic Discriminability for Visual Communication

Karen B. Schloss·Zachary Leggon·Laurent Lessard
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To interpret information visualizations, observers must determine how visual features map onto concepts. First and foremost, this ability depends on perceptual discriminability; e.g., observers must be able to see the difference between different colors for those colors to communicate different meanings. However, the ability to interpret visualizations also depends on semantic discriminability, the degree to which observers can infer a unique mapping between visual features and concepts, based on the visual features and concepts alone (i.e., without help from verbal cues such as legends or labels). Previous evidence suggested that observers were better at interpreting encoding systems that maximized semantic discriminability (maximizing association strength between assigned colors and concepts while minimizing association strength between unassigned colors and concepts), compared to a system that only maximized color-concept association strength. However, increasing semantic discriminability also resulted in increased perceptual distance, so it is unclear which factor was responsible for improved performance. In the present study, we conducted two experiments that tested for independent effects of semantic distance and perceptual distance on semantic discriminability of bar graph data visualizations. Perceptual distance was large enough to ensure colors were more than just noticeably different. We found that increasing semantic distance improved performance, independent of variation in perceptual distance, and when these two factors were uncorrelated, responses were dominated by semantic distance. These results have implications for navigating trade-offs in color palette design optimization for visual communication.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Karen B. Schloss, Zachary Leggon, Laurent Lessard. 2020-09-07. Semantic Discriminability for Visual Communication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03171

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

"If You're Not Doing It, Somebody Else Is": Active Negotiation and the Invisible Labor of Sustained LLM Use

Large language models (LLMs) have become fixtures of academic work even as their users describe them as degrading their writing, thinking, and skills. Dominant adoption frameworks read continued use as evidence of satisfaction, and cannot explain continued use of a distrusted tool. We interviewed 36 graduate student workers, balanced between English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) and non-EFL speakers, and introduce the Active Negotiation framework: a model of sustained LLM use as a recurring cycle of risk, mitigation, and justification. A failure surfaces a risk, mitigation labor addresses it, and a justification renders the residual risk tolerable until the next failure reopens the cycle. The cycle runs across three dimensions: practical, auditing output; internal, auditing one's own cognition and identity; and social, managing how peers and institutions perceive use. EFL participants invoke linguistic parity as a further justification. We reframe continued adoption as compliance sustained by invisible labor.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Skill Profiling with Attributable Reasoning (SPAR): A Wearable Analysis System for Boxing

A punch is a ballistic, full-body action driven by a kinetic chain running from the legs through the trunk to the arm, where a small sequencing error separates a scoring strike from a miss. Wearable sensors can capture this movement in the gym, but most deployable systems only classify which punch was thrown rather than assess how well it was thrown. We present Skill Profiling with Attributable Reasoning (SPAR), an eight-IMU garment and pressure-insole system that classifies each punch as expert or novice and treats an explanation of that prediction as feedback. Feedback is only useful if the person receiving it can act on it, so SPAR explains the prediction at three tiers, a per-joint attribution for the analyst, a counterfactual over kinetic-chain layers for the coach, and a plain-language narrative of the two for the athlete. Across 17 participants and 4,713 punches, SPAR reaches a leave-one-participant-out AUC of 0.842 (95% CI [0.769, 0.907] over participants). A frozen time-series foundation model encodes the joint-angle and plantar-force series, and a small transformer trained on the cohort classifies the encoding. We audit the two quantitative tiers and report six themes from a thematic analysis of interviews with six practicing boxing coaches.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Sampling Safe Futures: Multimodal Trajectory Planning for Personalized Safety in Anthropomorphic AI

Anthropomorphic artificial intelligence systems increasingly remember personal details, display empathy, and are engaged with as social counterparts, creating forms of risk that emerge from the evolution of the user-system relationship over time. Existing safeguards largely operate at the level of individual conversational turns and cannot determine whether a sequence of seemingly acceptable interactions is cumulatively moving a particular user toward harm. This paper introduces personalized trajectory-level safety, a framework that treats relational safety as a sequential decision problem over a latent escalation state inferred from the user's messages and influenced by the system's responses. At each turn, a screening step first discards any response strategy that does not preserve at least one safe continuation of the interaction under every plausible model of the user. Among the remaining strategies, we formulate action selection as multimodal trajectory sampling, and use a Generative Flow Network to generate diverse future evolutions in proportion to their plausibility, safety, and utility. The system then selects the strategy that preserves the largest fraction of safe and useful continuations. We evaluate the framework in simulation, calibrated on statistics reported for real human-chatbot interactions, and using response strategies derived from public benchmarks. Results show that trajectory-aware decision making substantially reduces the frequency of harmful states while keeping helpful interaction. This work reframes safety for anthropomorphic AI from response-level filtering to personalized control over the future evolution of human-AI relationships. The source code is available at https://github.com/benedettapicano/ANTHROPOMORPHIC_SAFETY_TRAJ.

cs.HC↗