Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2009.14513

How coordinate Bethe ansatz works for Inozemtsev model

Rob Klabbers·Jules Lamers
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Three decades ago, Inozemtsev found an isotropic long-range spin chain with elliptic pair potential that interpolates between the Heisenberg and Haldane-Shastry (HS) spin chains while admitting an exact solution throughout, based on a connection with the elliptic quantum Calogero-Sutherland model. Though Inozemtsev's spin chain is widely believed to be quantum integrable, the underlying algebraic reason for its exact solvability is not yet well understood. As a step in this direction we refine Inozemtsev's `extended coordinate Bethe ansatz' and clarify various aspects of the model's exact spectrum and its limits. We identify quasimomenta in terms of which the $M$-particle energy is close to being (functionally) additive, as one would expect from the limiting models; our expression is additive iff the energy of the elliptic Calogero-Sutherland system is so. This enables us to rewrite the energy and Bethe-ansatz equations on the elliptic curve, turning the spectral problem into a rational problem as might be expected for an isotropic spin chain. We treat the $M=2$ particle sector and its limits in detail. We identify an $S$-matrix that is independent of positions. We show that the Bethe-ansatz equations reduce to those of Heisenberg in one limit and give rise to the `motifs' of HS in the other limit. We show that, as the interpolation parameter changes, the `scattering states' from Heisenberg become Yangian highest-weight states for HS, while bound states become ($\mathfrak{sl}_2$-highest weight versions of) affine descendants of the magnons from $M=1$. For bound states we find a generalisation of the known equation for the `critical length' for the Heisenberg spin chain. We discuss completeness for $M=2$ by passing to the elliptic curve. Our review of the two-particle sectors of the Heisenberg and HS spin chains may be of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

math-phcond-mat.str-elhep-thmath.MPnlin.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rob Klabbers, Jules Lamers. 2020-09-30. How coordinate Bethe ansatz works for Inozemtsev model. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04281-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗